Which Leadership role do you prefer?
I would prefer the 'Transformational Leadership' role. A
transformational leader is someone who works closely with his or
her subordinates. he or she also guides them and inspires them.
This kind of leader does not need to impose his or her authority
over the subordinates. They follow him by the virtue of the
leader's attributes. These leaders also give clarity about the
vision and goals to the team members. This makes the task easy for
the members. Because of all these reasons, according to me, in an
ideal scenario, this leadership role is the best-suited role
because it benefits both the firm and the employees by supporting a
good work environment and task delivery.
However, you must keep in mind that different kinds of
leadership roles suit different kinds of organizational set-up. So,
you must also keep this point in mind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Content Motivation Theories
According to Content Motivation Theories, there are some
intrinsic factors of each human being that motivate them. Different
individuals have different needs and also there are different
motivating factors for each of them. I prefer the three listed
theories.
- Maslow's Hierarchy Theory of Needs - According
to this theory, there is a hierarchy of needs for a human being.
There are 5 levels to it. As soon as the lowest level gets
fulfilled, the human moves to the next level and tries to satisfy
it. Thus, the human being slowly moves up the hierarchy. The five
levels from the bottom are physiological needs, safety needs,
social needs, esteem needs, and self-actualization need. I prefer
this theory because it is very close to human psychology and it is
highly relevant. Individuals keep moving because of the internal
motivating factors and the topmost is self-actualization which
means the achievement of full potential which is next to
impossible. So, a person remains motivated throughout and this
theory always holds good.
- Mc Gregor's Theory X and Theory Y - According
to this theory, managers follow two major approaches in the
workplace. One is the authoritative approach called Theory X. It is
believed that the employees only get motivated by rewards and
punishments and also they need strict supervision. The second
approach is exactly opposite to theory X and it is called Theory Y.
According to this theory, employees do not need strict supervision,
they are committed to working and always feel motivated due to
their own intrinsic factors. I also prefer this theory, because it
is in line with Maslow's Hierarchy Theory. Moreover, it goes a step
ahead and its Theory Y is advantageous to both the organization and
the employee. It will also never lose relevance in the workplace
because there are different types of people in the workplace and
there are different intrinsic factors that motivate them. So, in
some places, Theory X will be applicable and at other places,
Theory Y will be applicable.
- ERG Theory - ERG Theory is again an advanced
work on Maslow's Theory. it was devised by Clayton. He reduced the
5 level hierarchy to a 3 level hierarchy. They are Existence Needs,
Relatedness Needs, and Growth Needs. Apart from this, he also
stated that human beings not only move up the hierarchy and always
feel motivated, but in the absence of any of the levels, humans
also move downwards. In other words, human beings lose motivation
if any of the levels in the hierarchy is not met. I also prefer
this theory because, from a human psychology perspective, it holds
true. We as human beings get motivated when the motivating factor
is present but at the same time, we also get demotivated when the
motivating factor is absent.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Process Motivation Theories
According to Process Theories, the motivational factors affect
the behaviour of individuals. The below listed three theories are
my preference.
- Equity Theory - According to this theory,
employees compare their efforts and rewards with other individuals
working at the same level. If they feel that they are not rewarded
as per their effort, they get demotivated and reduce their effort
or quit the organization. I prefer this theory because it holds
true in any work environment. How much ever we are motivated due to
our own intrinsic factors, if we see unfair treatment at work, we
feel betrayed and demotivated.
- Goal Setting Theory - According to this
theory, employees feel motivated at the workplace if they see clear
goals in front of them. It also affects their behaviour. I also
prefer this theory because this is another practical thing at the
workplace and it still holds good. If as an employee, we are
communicated about our goals clearly, we feel motivated to achieve
it. It is also related to basic human nature. If we are swimming in
the deep sea and we see the shore clearly, we put double effort to
reach there.
- Expectancy Theory
- As per this theory, every human act has an
expectation or belief attached to it. So, when a human being acts
in a particular way, he or she expects a certain outcome. And, the
attractiveness of the outcome will decide if he or she will act on
it or not. So, this theory is one of my favourites because again it
is very close to a normal human nature. For example, most of us
take up any work and get motivated to complete it when we know that
our efforts will be recognized in time and we will also get an
attractive reward.