In: Statistics and Probability
A researcher wanted to test the claim that, "Seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities." A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed. If a significance level of 5% is used, which of the following statements gives the correct conclusion?
Question 7 options:
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let be the proportion of occupants not wearing the seat belts who got killed and be the proportion of occupants wearing the seat belts who got killed. Therefore, we have:
Null and Alternative hypothesis:
Under Ho: the null hypothesis :
our test statistic is:
p-value = P(z>6.11)=0.00000. Since p-value is less than , we have sufficient evidence to rejectHo at 5% level of significance.
|
|
Both the statements are the same so i think you can mark either of them. but at 5% level of significance.