In: Accounting
Cash Payback Period, Net Present Value Method, and Analysis
Elite Apparel Inc. is considering two investment projects. The estimated net cash flows from each project are as follows:
Year | Plant Expansion | Retail Store Expansion | ||
1 | $109,000 | $91,000 | ||
2 | 89,000 | 107,000 | ||
3 | 77,000 | 73,000 | ||
4 | 70,000 | 51,000 | ||
5 | 21,000 | 44,000 | ||
Total | $366,000 | $366,000 |
Each project requires an investment of $198,000. A rate of 20% has been selected for the net present value analysis.
Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest | |||||
Year | 6% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 20% |
1 | 0.943 | 0.909 | 0.893 | 0.870 | 0.833 |
2 | 0.890 | 0.826 | 0.797 | 0.756 | 0.694 |
3 | 0.840 | 0.751 | 0.712 | 0.658 | 0.579 |
4 | 0.792 | 0.683 | 0.636 | 0.572 | 0.482 |
5 | 0.747 | 0.621 | 0.567 | 0.497 | 0.402 |
6 | 0.705 | 0.564 | 0.507 | 0.432 | 0.335 |
7 | 0.665 | 0.513 | 0.452 | 0.376 | 0.279 |
8 | 0.627 | 0.467 | 0.404 | 0.327 | 0.233 |
9 | 0.592 | 0.424 | 0.361 | 0.284 | 0.194 |
10 | 0.558 | 0.386 | 0.322 | 0.247 | 0.162 |
Required:
1a. Compute the cash payback period for each project.
Cash Payback Period | |
Plant Expansion | 1 yrs, 2yrs,3yrs,4yrs,5yrs? |
Retail Store Expansion 1yrs,2yrs,3yrs,4yrs,5yrs?? |
1b. Compute the net present value. Use the present value of $1 table above. If required, round to the nearest dollar.
Plant Expansion | Retail Store Expansion | |
Present value of net cash flow total | $ | $ |
Less amount to be invested | $ | $ |
Net present value | $ | $ |
2. Because of the timing of the receipt of the net cash flows, the (Plant expansion/ or retail store expansion?? offers a higher .(Net present value or net cash flow??
using cash payback period |
||
Initial investment |
$ 198,000.00 |
|
plant expansion |
||
year |
cash flow |
cumulative cash flow |
1 |
$ 109,000.00 |
$ 109,000.00 |
2 |
$ 89,000.00 |
$ 198,000.00 |
3 |
$ 77,000.00 |
$ 275,000.00 |
cash payback period | 2 years |
Retail store expansion |
||
year |
cash flow |
cumulative cash flow |
1 |
$ 91,000.00 |
$ 91,000.00 |
2 |
$ 107,000.00 |
$ 198,000.00 |
3 |
$ 73,000.00 |
$ 271,000.00 |
cash payback period |
2 years |
From the above,
Cash payback period |
||
Plant expansion |
2 years |
|
Retail store expansion |
2 years |
1.b solution
Under net present value,
Plant expansion:
year |
cash flow(a) |
Present value factor@20%(b) |
Present value(axb) |
1 |
$ 109,000.00 |
0.833 |
$ 90,797.00 |
2 |
$ 89,000.00 |
0.694 |
$ 61,766.00 |
3 |
$ 77,000.00 |
0.579 |
$ 44,583.00 |
4 |
$ 70,000.00 |
0.482 |
$ 33,740.00 |
5 |
$ 21,000.00 |
0.402 |
$ 8,442.00 |
Present value of net cash flow total |
$ 239,328.00 |
Retail store expansion
year |
cash flow(a) |
Present value factor@20%(b) |
Present value(axb) |
1 |
$ 91,000.00 |
0.833 |
$ 75,803.00 |
2 |
$ 107,000.00 |
0.694 |
$ 74,258.00 |
3 |
$ 73,000.00 |
0.579 |
$ 42,267.00 |
4 |
$ 51,000.00 |
0.482 |
$ 24,582.00 |
5 |
$ 44,000.00 |
0.402 |
$ 17,688.00 |
Present value of net cash flow total |
$ 234,598.00 |
Plant expansion |
Retail store expansion |
|
Present value of net cash flow total |
$ 239,328.00 |
$ 234,598.00 |
Less amount to be invested |
$ 198,000.00 |
$ 198,000.00 |
Net present value(a-b) |
$ 41,328.00 |
$ 36,598.00 |
2.ans
From the above plant expansion offers a higher net present value/ net cash flow than retail store expansion.