Question

whats the Hanushek critique? what evidence is used to support it?

whatvare some responses to this critique? why may there be a weak link between resources and student achievment in recent work?

Answer 1

. Hanushek is it related with education equality and economic growth model where the educational quality is related with the economic growth and economic growth rate of poor countries it analysis the achievement of education on the basis of the resources are available.
Knowledge is an essential element of country’s development and economic growth.
There is a direct relationship between economic growth and the level of education to all the sectors of the society.
The most important critic is there that the educational high quality is not always indicator of the higher economic growth.
The big institutes and big schools never guaranteed a big educational structure.
Every level education with the motive of literacy spread around the country is important.
There are many economist who give their responses to this critic and the prove that there is a weak link between resources and student achievement in recent work.
It doesn’t mean that if resources are not available then students are not able to achieve the desired result the good education is also depend on the good mentor and good teacher of the society.
There must be a good education system at every level so that it is more convenient for the student to enhance their skills and to make them self available and prepare according to to the economic requirement and need of the society.