Question

Discuss the FIVE main justifications of Research Triangulation according to Greene & McClintock (1985)

Answer 1

By going with the classic definition triangulation refers to the use of multiple methods with offsetting or counteracting biases in order to investigate the same phenomenon and strengthen the validity of inquiry results. Five main justifications of research triangulation according to Greene & McClintock are:

(1) The triangulation method requires the use of two or more methods to assess the same conceptual phenomenon. This helps to preserve the counteracting biases of the various methods and at the same time implement independently.

(2) The core argument of triangulation is that all methods have biases and limitations. Using only one method will yield biased and limited results.

(2) The results of using various methods converge/corroborate one another which enhances the validity of inquiry.

(4) When you are not clear which of several options for inquiry is correct, then all of the methods should be selected so as to triangulate on the most useful or the most likely to be true.

(4) Because of the ability to use various methods triangulation also allows the researcher to find out the possible threats to the validity which might create problem in the interpretation.