In: Electrical Engineering
Radiation Pattern Optimization of a 6 element Yagi-Uda
Antenna
This example, optimizes a 6 element Yagi-Uda antenna for higher
directivity at zenith (elevation = 90 deg). The design frequency
and typical dimensions of the metal structures are chosen for VHF
operation The design of a Yagi-Uda is a challenging task owing to
the sensitivity of the pattern to physical parameters. This example
will design a Yagi-Uda antenna by using a direct search based
optimization approach. The Yagi-Uda antenna is a widely used
radiating structure for a variety of applications in commercial and
military sectors. Arguably, the most popular use of this antenna
was in reception of TV signals in the VHF-UHF range of
frequenciesThe Yagi is a directional traveling-wave antenna with a
single driven element, usually a folded dipole or a standard
dipole, which is surrounded by several passive dipoles. The passive
elements form the reflector and director, with the name identifying
the position relative to the driven element. The reflector dipole
is positioned behind the driven element in the direction of the
back lobe of the antenna radiation while the director, as the name
suggests, is placed in front of the driven element, in the
direction where a main beam would form.
This example requires the following product:
Global Optimization Toolbox™
Design Parameters
We begin the process of designing the Yagi-Uda antenna using
optimization techniques. Choose the design frequency at the center
of the VHF band [2].
freq = 165e6;
wirediameter = 19e-3;
c = physconst('lightspeed');
lambda = c/freq;
Create Yagi-Uda Antenna
The driven element for the Yagi-Uda antenna is a folded dipole.
This is a standard exciter for such an antenna due to the required
higher input impedance. Adjust the length and width parameters of
the folded dipole. Since we model cylindrical structures as
equivalent metal strips, the width is calculated using a utility
function available in the Antenna Toolbox™. The length is chosen to
be at the design frequency.
d = dipoleFolded;
d.Length = lambda/2;
d.Width = cylinder2strip(wirediameter/2);
d.Spacing = d.Length/60;
Create a Yagi-Uda antenna with the exciter as the folded dipole.
Choose the reflector and director length to be . Choose the
reflector and director spacing to be , respectively. These choices
are an initial guess and will serve as a start point for the
optimization procedure.
Numdirs = 4;
refLength = 0.5;
dirLength = 0.5*ones(1,Numdirs);
refSpacing = 0.3;
dirSpacing = 0.25*ones(1,Numdirs);
initialdesign = [dirLength refSpacing dirSpacing].*lambda;
yagidesign = yagiUda;
yagidesign.Exciter = d;
yagidesign.NumDirectors = Numdirs;
yagidesign.ReflectorLength = refLength*lambda;
yagidesign.DirectorLength = dirLength.*lambda;
yagidesign.ReflectorSpacing = refSpacing*lambda;
yagidesign.DirectorSpacing = dirSpacing*lambda;
show(yagidesign)
Plot Radiation Pattern at Design Frequency
Prior to executing the optimization process, plot the radiation
pattern for the initial guess in 3D.
fig1 = figure;
pattern(yagidesign,freq);
As expected, this antenna does not have a higher directivity in the direction we desire, i.e. at zenith (elevation = 90 deg). Overall the initial Yagi-Uda antenna design is a poorly designed radiator.
Set up Optimization Parameters
Our optimization will include the parasitic element lengths and the
inter-element spacings. We establish lower and upper bounds on the
allowed reflector length and director lengths as well as the
spacings in terms of . We choose a 60 degree sector around zenith
to compute the directivity, with the ultimate goal of maximizing
the directed radiation in this sector as compared to sidelobes and
the backlobe.
dirLengthBounds = [0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40; % lower bound on
director length
0.495 0.495 0.495 0.495]; % upper bound on director length
refSpacingBounds = [0.05; % lower bound on reflector spacing
0.30]; % upper bound on reflector spacing
dirSpacingBounds = [0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05; % lower bound on director
spacing
0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23]; % upper bound on director spacing
LB = [dirLengthBounds(1,:) refSpacingBounds(1)
dirSpacingBounds(1,:) ].*lambda;
UB = [dirLengthBounds(2,:) refSpacingBounds(2)
dirSpacingBounds(2,:) ].*lambda;
parasitic_values = [ yagidesign.DirectorLength, ...
yagidesign.ReflectorSpacing ...
yagidesign.DirectorSpacing];
elang = [60 120]; % elevation beamwidth angles at az = 90
Direct Search Optimization
The Global Optimization Toolbox™ provides a direct search based
optimization function called patternsearch. We use this function
with two options specified with the psoptimset function. At every
iteration, plot the best value of the objective function and limit
the total number of iterations to 30. The objective function aims
to maximize the difference between the maximum directivity of the
main beam and the maxima of sidelobes and the back-lobe. Pass the
objective function to the patternsearch function by using an
anonymous function together with the bounds and the options
structure.The objective function used during the optimization
process by patternsearch is available in the file
yagi_objective_function.
The evaluation of the directivity in different directions corresponding to the angular region defined for maximum radiation as well as maximum sidelobe/ and the backlobe level is given in the function calculate_objectives available within yagi_objective function.
patternoptions = psoptimset(@patternsearch);
patternoptions.PlotFcns = @psplotbestf;
patternoptions.MaxIter = 55;
optimdesign = patternsearch(@(x)
yagi_objective_function(yagidesign,x,freq,elang),...
parasitic_values,[],[],[],[],LB,UB,[],patternoptions);
Maximum number of iterations exceeded: increase
options.MaxIterations.
Plot Optimized Pattern
The optimized antenna pattern is now plotted at the design
frequency.
yagidesign.DirectorLength = optimdesign(1:4);
yagidesign.ReflectorSpacing = optimdesign(5);
yagidesign.DirectorSpacing = optimdesign(6:9);
fig2 = figure;
pattern(yagidesign,freq)
E and H-Plane Cuts of Pattern
To obtain a better insight into the behavior in the two orthogonal
planes, we plot the normalized magnitude of the electric field in
the E and H-planes, i.e. azimuth = 0 and 90 deg respectively.
fig3 = figure;
pattern(yagidesign,freq,0,0:1:359);
fig4 = figure;
pattern(yagidesign,freq,90,0:1:359);
The optimized design shows a significant improvement in the radiation pattern. There is higher directivity achieved in the desired direction toward zenith. The back lobe is small resulting in a good front to back ratio for this antenna. Let us calculate the directivity at zenith , the Front-to-Back ratio and the beamwidth in E and H-planes, respectively.
D_max = pattern(yagidesign,freq,0,90);
D_back = pattern(yagidesign,freq,0,-90);
F_B_ratio = D_max - D_back;
Eplane_beamwidth = beamwidth(yagidesign,freq,0,1:1:360);
Hplane_beamwidth = beamwidth(yagidesign,freq,90,1:1:360);
Comparison with Manufacturer Data Sheet
The optimized Yagi-Uda antenna achieves a forward directivity of
10.2 dBi, which translates to 8.1 dBd (relative to a dipole). This
is close to the gain value reported by the datasheet (8.5 dBd). The
F/B ratio is 30 dB. The optimized Yagi-Uda antenna has a E-plane
beamwidth of 55 deg while the datasheet lists the E-plane beamwidth
of 56 deg. The H-plane beamwidth of the optimized Yagi-uda antenna
is 67 deg, which is slightly broader than the datasheet listed
value of 63 deg. Furthermore, impedance matching over the band has
not been considered.
Tabulating Initial and Optimized Design
The initial design guesses and the final optimized design values
are shown in the table below:
yagiparam= {'Director Length - 1'; 'Director Length - 2';
'Director Length - 3'; 'Director Length - 4';
'Reflector Spacing'; 'Director Spacing - 1';
'Director Spacing - 2';'Director Spacing - 3';
'Director Spacing - 4'};
initialdesign = initialdesign';
optimdesign = optimdesign';
T = table(initialdesign,optimdesign,'RowNames',yagiparam)
T =
9x2 table
initialdesign optimdesign
_____________ ___________
Director Length - 1 0.90846 0.77438
Director Length - 2 0.90846 0.77438
Director Length - 3 0.90846 0.77438
Director Length - 4 0.90846 0.77438
Reflector Spacing 0.54508 0.10758
Director Spacing - 1 0.45423 0.10539
Director Spacing - 2 0.45423 0.35539
Director Spacing - 3 0.45423 0.41789
Director Spacing - 4 0.45423 0.29289