Question

In: Operations Management

What are long-arm statutes, and how do they allow states to exercise jurisdiction over individuals or...

What are long-arm statutes, and how do they allow states to exercise jurisdiction over individuals or business entities?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Common law is where the judgments are based on previous judicial decisions and precedents rather than statutes. Though the decisions may rely on some statutes and constitution, it is largely based on precedents and interpretation on statutes,   done by judges on previous decisions. In common law(adversarial system), lawyers present, question and argue before judges.In civil law decisions are strictly based on statutes and judge plays the primary role in questioning.

English common law originated in the British kingdom consistss of statutes, rules, and precedents. It emerged as a common law for the entire British kingdom in the early part of the second millennium. It developed based primarily on judicial decisions. As the parliament system developed in the United Kingdom, the parliament started adopting laws that supplemented the existing common law

The English common law is the basis on which American law is built upon, except for common law of crimes (and in-state Louisiana where civil law is predominant). Principles codified by Mr. Blackstone from Britain became the basis for American law.

Over time, most definitions of crimes have now been overwhelmed by legal definition offered by individual states. Now state courts have to look into state judicial interpretation of legal matters. State legislatures have more power and Congress primarily takes care interstate activities, war, taxation, etc.The English common law is the precedent for American law


Related Solutions

Two of the most important Supreme Court cases dealing with long arm jurisdiction are the International...
Two of the most important Supreme Court cases dealing with long arm jurisdiction are the International Shoe case (in the text) and the Worldwide Volkswagen v. Woodson (Supreme Court website or other source) case. What is the minimum contacts standard? How does it work, and when is it applied?
When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to the jurisdic­tion is...
When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to the jurisdic­tion is via the Internent?
1. When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to a state...
1. When can a court exercise jurisdiction over a party whose only connection to a state is via the Internet? In other words, when might there by sufficient minimum contacts to give a court jurisdiction over a remote party? For instance, Is a passive website that can be accessed from anywhere enough to establish jurisdiction or is more needed? 2. Why would a corporation prefer to be seen as ethical? To whom does a corporation owe a duty and what...
The well-recognized bases for national jurisdiction over various parties from different nation-states.
The well-recognized bases for national jurisdiction over various parties from different nation-states.
Jurisdiction over Criminal Acts State U had a long-standing relationship with N, the president of State...
Jurisdiction over Criminal Acts State U had a long-standing relationship with N, the president of State P. President N had regularly provided information to State U’s national intelligence agency on activities of the political foes of State U both in State P and in the countries that neighbor State P. At the same time, State U had long ignored N’s activities in helping drug runners transport illicit drugs into State U. Now a change in the government in State U...
How does Stark and anti-kickback statutes for compliance within a health services organization. what statutes might...
How does Stark and anti-kickback statutes for compliance within a health services organization. what statutes might be address from compliance perspective as a current or future healthcare administration leader. Explain how a efforts to comply with these statutes address safe harbors and be specific about their relevance for a health services organization.
Do you think states need to figure out how to better assist individuals and their families...
Do you think states need to figure out how to better assist individuals and their families that are living in poverty or do you think it's still the federal government’s responsibility? My question is how can we help individuals and families in need without taking more money from people that are trying to make ends meet, aka the taxpayers.
Why do androgyny relationships allow individuals to cope effectively in a varity of situations? Explain this...
Why do androgyny relationships allow individuals to cope effectively in a varity of situations? Explain this reasoning conceptually and include one example.
How do statutes of limitations protect professional nurse-defendants? Do they also protect the injured parties?
How do statutes of limitations protect professional nurse-defendants? Do they also protect the injured parties?
Based on a recent mass shooting in the United States: What do you think drives individuals...
Based on a recent mass shooting in the United States: What do you think drives individuals to engage in mass shootings of this type? What criminological theories can we use to potentially explain the causes of these kinds of mass shootings? What practical steps do you that policymakers, local jurisdictions, and/or individual citizens can take to prevent high casualty mass shootings such as this from happening in the future?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT