Question

In: Chemistry

Following dilution of a concentrated solution, the absorbance is determined to be 3.935 on our BioTek...

Following dilution of a concentrated solution, the absorbance is determined to be 3.935 on our BioTek Plate Reader. What, if any, changes should be made to this experiment?

a The sample should be diluted at least two fold

b The sample should be concentrated 2 fold

c The sample should be diluted 100 fold

d The sample should be put into a different microplate.

e There is nothing wrong with this analysis and the 3.935 should be recorded.

Solutions

Expert Solution

According to Lambert-Beer's law absorbance in dependent on concentration and path length of solution, which is represented by formula

A = Cl ................................(1)

where, A = absorbance

   = Molar absorption coefficient

C = concentration of solution

l = Path length of solution

So,

a. When  sample is diluted at least two fold than

    C = C/2

putting this value in (1)

A = Cl / 2, Hence absorbance of new solution is half of absorbance of stock solution

given absorption of stock solution is = 3.935

so absorbance of new solution is = 3.935 / 2 = 1.9675

b. When  sample is concentrated two fold than

    C = 2C

putting this value in (1)

A = 2Cl , Hence absorbance of new solution is double of absorbance of stock solution

given absorption of stock solution is = 3.935

so absorbance of new solution is = 3.935 x 2 = 7.87

c. When  sample is diluted at least 100 fold than

    C = C/100

putting this value in (1)

A = Cl / 100, Hence absorbance of new solution is 100th part of absorbance of stock solution

given absorption of stock solution is = 3.935

so absorbance of new solution is = 3.935 / 100 = 0.03935

d. When  sample is put into a different microplate

In relation (1) we can see that width of microplate is directly proportional to absorbance so if width of new microplate is increased than absorbance is increases and if width of new microplate is decreased than absorbance is decreases.  

e. There is nothing wrong with this analysis and the 3.935 should be recorded it means stock solution was analyzed without changing its concentration or microplate.

  


Related Solutions

Why could the second measurement of the absorbance of the most concentrated sample differ from the...
Why could the second measurement of the absorbance of the most concentrated sample differ from the first?
In order to make a Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) dilution buffer, you need to make some concentrated...
In order to make a Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) dilution buffer, you need to make some concentrated stock solutions first. Describe how to make the following solution: make 500 mL of a 1 M Tris-Cl pH 8.0 stock solution (Tris base is a solid with a FW: 121.14 g/mol) 

(A) Your whole cell lysate sample gives an absorbance reading of 15 when undiluted. What dilution...
(A) Your whole cell lysate sample gives an absorbance reading of 15 when undiluted. What dilution would be necessary to get the absorbance down to 0.5? (B) You want a total whole cell lysate sample volume of 1.0 mL to retest its absorbance. Using the dilution factor you determine in part (A), what volume of the whole cell lysate sample and what volume of buffer would you use to make the dilution?
Absorbance at 540 nm of Bromocresol Purple Dilution Series test tube concentration of sample (ug/mL) A540...
Absorbance at 540 nm of Bromocresol Purple Dilution Series test tube concentration of sample (ug/mL) A540 nm BcP dilution 1 0 0 n/a 2 0.9375 0.041 1:16 3 1.875 0.08 1:08 4 3.75 0.155 1:04 5 7.5 0.306 1:02 6 15 0.614 0:00 1. The point 0/0 is an important and valid point on this graph. Why? (Explain)  Explain how a hand-drawn graph and excel graph are similar or different. 2. How is the Beer’s Law equation similar to that of...
Absorbance values for five standard solutions of a colored solute were determined at 410 nm with...
Absorbance values for five standard solutions of a colored solute were determined at 410 nm with a 1.00?cm path length, giving the following table of data: Solute concentration (M) A 0.250 0.175 0.500 0.350 0.750 0.525 1.000 0.700 1.250 0.875 Determine the absorbance values you would expect for solutions with the following concentrations: 0.4 M 0.6 M 0.8 M 1.1 M Caluclate the average molar absorptivity of the compound: ____ 1/M*cm
For each of the following, is the solution acidic, basic, neutral, or cannot be determined? For...
For each of the following, is the solution acidic, basic, neutral, or cannot be determined? For each, write the equation for the dominant equilibrium which determined the pH, and justify your pH prediction. Kw = 1.0 x 10-14 100 mL of 0.10 M NaH3P2O7; Ka1 = 3.0 x 10-2, Ka2 = 4.4 x 10-3, Ka3 = 2.5 x 10-7, and Ka4 = 5.6 x 10-10 for H4P2O7. 100 mL of 0.10 M K2H2P2O7; see Part a for Ka values 100...
Consider the following dilution steps from a 3.51 M stock solution of H2SO4. 1. 25. mL...
Consider the following dilution steps from a 3.51 M stock solution of H2SO4. 1. 25. mL of the 3.51 M stock solution is diluted to 150. mL to make soln2. 2. 35. mL of soln2 is diluted to 200. mL to make soln3. 3. 45. mL of soln3 is diluted to 250. mL to make soln4. 4. 50. mL of soln4 is diluted to 300. mL to make soln5. • Calculate the concentration, in M, for soln5. • Derive a...
The concentration of the initial stock solution is 3.00 M. The first dilution is made by...
The concentration of the initial stock solution is 3.00 M. The first dilution is made by measuring 10.00 mL with a volumetric pipet and diluting in a 100 mL volumetric flask. What is the concentration of the first solution? The second solution is made by measuring 25.00 mL of the first solution and diluting in a 100 mL volumetric flask. What is the concentration of the second solution? The third solution is made by measuring 50.00 mL of the second...
Explain the relationship between light absorbance and solution concentration for a solution which obeys the Beer-Lambert...
Explain the relationship between light absorbance and solution concentration for a solution which obeys the Beer-Lambert law.
A solution containing a mixture of the compounds X and Y had an absorbance of 1.00...
A solution containing a mixture of the compounds X and Y had an absorbance of 1.00 at 443 nm and an absorbance of 0.861 at 520 nm when measured with a 1.00 cm cell. The molar absorptivities (ε) of X and Y at each wavelength are shown in the table below. 443 16410 3871. 520 3993 6425
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT