In: Statistics and Probability
Read the “Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software” article (Spinellis, et al., 2009). What are the strengths and weaknesses of this particular study? (For example, does the study do an adequate job of collecting and analyzing representative samples?) What would you suggest that the authors do to remedy those weaknesses and why? Use both your text and the article An Introduction to Research Design (Ganster, 2003). You may also draw on any book, article, website, or other reliable resource in answering this question.
a. Can be refreshed through criticism from clients all the time.
b. Permits discernible and target assessment of open and free source programming
c. Programming assessment process is quickened through a precise methodology
d. Trust in choosing open source programming is guaranteed by better choices
d. Metric qualities are naturally determined
e. Apparatuses are straightforward and accessible for assessment process
f. Subjectivity in the quality estimation process is decreased by
computerizing quality estimation
a. Ongoing documentation, for example, form 1.7 should be interpreted
from French to English for more extensive use
b. drive reception and advancement by programming bundles is yet to be accomplished
c. Scarcely any model's site contains just a solitary page and has not changed and stay as it was without any connects to any valuable asset material.
d. Mechanical approval of the model is required and assembling of important criticism must be finished.
So as to conquer the shortcomings:
a. Programming projects ought to be refreshed with incorporation of a module with manages the language change
b. Programming should be made compact with stage freedom qualities
c. Sites ought to be refreshed routinely and connections ought to be incorporated wherever further references are required
d. One can make programming open source to maintain a strategic distance from modern approval and watch the prevalence of the product to gauge the achievement of the product.