In: Statistics and Probability
Recent research indicates that the effectiveness of antidepressant medication is directly related to the severity of the depression (Khan, Brodhead, Kolts & Brown, 2005). Based on pretreatment depression scores, patients were divided into four groups based on their level of depression. After receiving the antidepressant medication, depression scores were measured again and the amount of improvement was recorded for each patient. The following data are similar to the results of the study.
Low Moderate |
High Moderate |
Moderately Severe |
Severe |
---|---|---|---|
3.3 | 0.7 | 2 | 2.8 |
0 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
3.2 | 4 | 1.1 | 1.9 |
2.6 | 1.4 | 1 | 4.2 |
0.8 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
2.9 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 1.7 |
1.1 | 0 | 1.8 | 1.1 |
2.9 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 3.2 |
4.5 | 2 | 4.7 | 3.5 |
1.6 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
3.3 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 3.4 |
1 | 1.5 | 3 | 3.2 |
0.6 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
2.3 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
3.7 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 2.1 |
2.8 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
1.7 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.6 |
1.6 | 0.9 | 0 | 4.1 |
1.8 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 3.6 |
2.1 | 2 | 1.4 | 2.3 |
2.1 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 0.7 |
2.4 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
3.3 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
0.1 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 2.6 |
4.5 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 3.5 |
2.6 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 3.1 |
2.7 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 2.5 |
1.9 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 2.6 |
1.7 | 2 | 1.7 | 3.8 |
1.3 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.5 |
1.5 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
2.5 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
4.2 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 3.4 |
2.1 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 2.1 |
1.5 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 1.5 |
1.2 | 3 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
1.9 | 1 | 1.7 | 3.8 |
1.1 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
3.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
1.2 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 2.5 |
3.5 | 1.8 | 0 | 1.9 |
1.1 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 2.5 |
2.8 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 2.5 |
1.2 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 0 |
1.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 3.4 |
3.2 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
0.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 3.1 |
0.4 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 2.1 |
1.6 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 4.1 |
2.2 | 2.2 | 2 | 4.1 |
3.5 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 2.1 |
2 | 3.9 | 4 | 3.8 |
2.4 | 1.6 | 2 | 4.1 |
0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 3.6 |
3.7 | 2 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
0.8 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1.5 |
4.4 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 3.2 |
2.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
3 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
1.6 | 0.7 | 1 | 2.6 |
1.7 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 3.9 |
This is the summary table for the ANOVA test:
S.S. | d.f. | M.S. | |
Between | 14.348360655737 | 3 | 4.7827868852458 |
---|---|---|---|
Within | 260.6737704918 | 240 | 1.0861407103825 |
TOTAL | 275.02213114754 | 243 |
From this table, you obtain the necessary statistics for the
ANOVA:
F-ratio: 4.4034689424001
p-value: 0.00489
η2=η2= 0.052171658316617
What is your final conclusion? Use a significance level of
α=0.02α=0.02.
Explain what this tells us about the equality of mean?
Let's look at the boxplot for each treatment:
012345Depression ScoresLow ModerateHigh ModerateModerately SevereSevere
How could boxplots refine our conclusion in an ANOVA test? Your answer should address this specific problem.
Edit
Insert
Formats
1)
final conclusion? Use a significance level of α=0.02
Since p-value = 0.00489 < significance level of α=0.02 so we reject the Null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between treatments.
2)
about the equality of mean
since our Null hypothesis is that means for treatments are equal and our alternative hypothesis is that means for treatments are not equal.
Since p-value = 0.00489 < significance level of α=0.02 so we reject the Null hypothesis and conclude that means for treatments are not equal.
3)
boxplot for each treatment
since boxplot for each treatment was not given , so i have ploted the boxplots
From above boxplot there is one outlier is present in the high moderate treatment.
Since The boxplots are not overlapped to each other we can conclude that that there is a significant difference between treatments.