Question

In: Mechanical Engineering

The rate of emission of SO2 from the stack of a power plant is 150 gm/sec....

The rate of emission of SO2 from the stack of a power plant is 150 gm/sec. The stack height is 50 m. Calculate the effective plume height on a sunny September day when the wind velocity is 5 m/sec. Use Class B stability. The effluents are being released at 10m/s and at a temperature of 310oK. The atmospheric temperature is 293oK. The stack diameter is 0.5 m

Solutions

Expert Solution

1) Deacon power law for calculating wind speed at stack height

u = u1 * (z/z1)p

Where,

u = desired but unknown wind speed,  (us)

u1 = wind speed at known height, (u10)

z = height where wind speed is unknown, hs

z1 = height where wind speed is known, 10m

p = exponent from table 3-3 in the text = 0.15

Therefore, u = u1 * (z/z1)p = 5* (50/10)0.07 = 5.6 m/sec

2) Check for downwash:

Vs / u >= 1.5 (downwash conditions need not be considered) = 10.0/5.6 = 1.787 >1.5 (therefore downwash need not be considered)

Where,

Vs = stack velocity in m/sec

u = wind speed at plume elevation

3) Calculate buoyancy flux parameter

Fb = g * vs * d2 * ΔT / (4 * Ts)   = 9.81 *  10* 12 * (310- 293) / (4 *310) = 1.3435m4/s3 (Fb <55m4/s3)

4) Calculate temperature difference

ΔT = Ts - Ta = 310 - 293 = 170K

5) Calculate cross over temperature difference (ΔT)c

for Fb< 55m4/s3

(ΔT)c = 0.0297 * Ts * vs 1/3 / ds2/3  = 0.0297 * 310 * 101/3 / 1 2/3  = 19.80K

6) Evaluate temperature differences

if ΔT > (ΔT)c  plume rise is buoyancy dominated or else momentum dominated

Here, ΔT< (ΔT)c hence the plume rise is momentum dominated

7) Calculate final plume rise Δh

Δh for momentum dominated plumes and unstable atmospheric conditions

Δh = 3 * ds * (Vs / u) = 3 * 1 * (10 / 5.6) = 5.4 m

8) Calculate final effective plume height H

H = 5.4 + 50 = 55.4 m


Related Solutions

In principle, is this reaction a feasible method of removing SO2 from power-plant emissions?
In principle, is this reaction a feasible method of removing SO2 from power-plant emissions?
A chimney with a design stack height of 200m is emitting SO2 at a rate of...
A chimney with a design stack height of 200m is emitting SO2 at a rate of 600g/s on a sunny day in summer, with moderate wind speed at the stack altitude. the volumetric flow rate is measured as 26m3/s, and the wind speed at a height of 10m above the ground is 5m/s. Calculate the grout level concentration of SO2 1km downward of the stack
The reaction SO2(g)+2H2S(g)←→3S(s)+2H2O(g) is the basis of a suggested method for removal of SO2from power-plant stack...
The reaction SO2(g)+2H2S(g)←→3S(s)+2H2O(g) is the basis of a suggested method for removal of SO2from power-plant stack gases. The standard free energy of each substance are ΔG∘fS(s) = 0 kJ/mol, ΔG∘fH2O(g) = -228.57 kJ/mol, ΔG∘fSO2(g) = -300.4 kJ/mol, ΔG∘fH2S(g) = -33.01 kJ/mol. If PSO2 = PH2S and the vapor pressure of water is 20 torr , calculate the equilibrium SO2 pressure in the system at 298 K.
Coal is burned at an electric power generation plant at a rate of 150 kg/minute with...
Coal is burned at an electric power generation plant at a rate of 150 kg/minute with 8% excess air (dry). The coal has a composition (mass based) of xC (kg C/coal), xH (kg H/coal), xS (kg Sulfur/coal) and xash (kg ash/coal). The coal produces 20 kg/minute of ash. The outlet gases, on a dry basis (i.e. we exclude any water from the calculation), have the composition (volume basis): yCO2=0.1418, yCO=0.024, ySO2=0.003, yO2=0.027, yN2=0.8042. Calculate the coal composition, air demand and...
A snoke stack with an effective height of 45 m emits SO2 at a rate of...
A snoke stack with an effective height of 45 m emits SO2 at a rate of 8 kg hr -1. What is the contribution of this stack to ground-level SO2 concentrations at a school yard 950 m downwind, if wind speed is 1.5 m s-1 on a sunny winter day? Assuming unlimited mixing height, and the atmosphere stability is unstable?
The reaction SO2(g)+2H2S(g)←−→3S(s)+2H2O(g) is the basis of a suggested method for removal of SO2 from power-plant...
The reaction SO2(g)+2H2S(g)←−→3S(s)+2H2O(g) is the basis of a suggested method for removal of SO2 from power-plant stack gases. The standard free energy of each substance are ΔG∘fS(s) = 0 kJ/mol, ΔG∘fH2O(g) = -228.57 kJ/mol, ΔG∘fSO2(g) = -300.4 kJ/mol, ΔG∘fH2S(g) = -33.01 kJ/mol.              C) If PSO2 = PH2S and the vapor pressure of water is 20 torr , calculate the equilibrium SO2 pressure in the system at 298 K.
How to calculate theoritical NOx and SO2 (mg/Nm3) in gases at coal fired power plant, if...
How to calculate theoritical NOx and SO2 (mg/Nm3) in gases at coal fired power plant, if known : Coal Calorific Value = 4500 kcal/kg Fuel consumption = 180 t/h Excess air = 18% Oxygen in exhaust gases = 5% Flue Gas Temperature in exhaust gases = 135 deg C Carbon Content = 30.110 Hydrogen Content = 3.610 Oxygen Content = 9.850 Sulfur Content = 0.330 Nitrogen Content = 0.700 Ash Content = 5.740 Moisture Content = 32.530 Thank you!
A car idling emits NOxat a rate of 2 g/sec. Assuming an effective “stack” (tailpipe) height...
A car idling emits NOxat a rate of 2 g/sec. Assuming an effective “stack” (tailpipe) height of 2 feet, Class C stability, and a wind speed at tailpipe height of 0.5 m/sec, estimate the ground-level concentration of NOx100 m directly downwind. Terrain is rural.
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant...
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would cost $269.63 million,...
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant...
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would require an initial...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT