Question

In: Accounting

Case 4 EcoPak Inc. The time has come for EcoPak to expand its main factory onto...

Case 4

EcoPak Inc.

The time has come for EcoPak to expand its main factory onto the adjacent land that was contaminated by the operations of its prior owner, Waterfalls Inc. EcoPak’s current use of the land was permitted to be continued from the previous owners without additional environmental remediation. However, if EcoPak wants to expand onto the adjacent land, it will be required to do extensive remediation work to comply with environmental laws. Development approvals will require complete restoration of the land by removal and replacement of all the contaminated soil before any new construction can be started.

Mike and Kam had obtained audited financial statements as part of their due diligence before purchasing the property, and the audited financial statements said nothing about the problem even though Waterfalls was aware of it.

EcoPak has engaged Rachel Roy, a lawyer who specializes in environmental law, to advise on this matter. Rachel advises EcoPak’s board that it may have a claim against Waterfalls and the auditors of the financial statements they had relied on. Rachel outlines the following case EcoPak could make against Waterfalls’ auditor, G&Q.

G&Q had a legal duty of care to Kam and Mike as prospective purchasers of the property, since Waterfalls had specifically engaged the auditor for the StyreneTech subsidiary to facilitate its sale to a new investor. There was a breach in that duty because the financial statements had omitted a material, known liability for site cleanup, so they did not comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in this regard. Instead, G&Q provided an unmodified audit opinion stating that the financial statements were fairly presented in accordance with GAAP. Either their audit was deficient in not turning up this omitted liability, or they were negligent and complicit with the company in covering up the material information. In the latter case, they have associated themselves with misleading information, clearly a breach of their duty to users of the information as well as a violation of the standards of auditing and the rules of professional ethics.

EcoPak will easily be able to prove they suffered damage by showing the amount that must be spent on the site restoration to proceed with their planned expansion onto land they had purchased with the understanding it was suitable for any reasonable use their business would have for it in the future. The claim should be for the full amount of the cleanup plus EcoPak’s legal costs of obtaining a fair remedy for Waterfalls’ wrong. EcoPak can also easily show a connection between the breach of duty and the resulting damage, as the losses occurred subsequent to G&Q’s audit and could have been avoided if the audit had been done properly. After a thorough discussion, EcoPak’s board votes in favour of pursuing the lawsuit against both Waterfalls and its auditor.

1- How would you consider EcoPak in its relationship with the auditor?

2- How would EcoPak support its case against the auditor? (What approves or support should EcoPak show against the auditor?

3- How the auditor will defend himself?

Solutions

Expert Solution

  1. the dictionary gives meaning to the term due diligence as the investigation done before purchasing another company in order to a avoid harmful effects. so here Ecopack assigned G&Q audits to investigate and to give due diligence to avoid harmful effect in future. Here we can treat the relationship of Ecpark with G&Q as an investigation assigner and investigator. Investigators have to be truthful on the investigation and he has to follow the code of conduct ore ethics in his investigation as per the law prevailing in the country and of course of the professional to which he is associated.
  2. As I said in above paragraph the relationship between Ecopark with G&Q as an investigation assigner and investigator.Investigators have to be truthful on the investigation and he has to follow the code of conduct ore ethics in his investigation as per the law prevailing in the country and of course the professional to which he is associated. As an auditor G&Q is not allowed to act as an agent of Waterfalls for sale of its subsidiary because he performing an investigation against the waterfalls for another company. It is a breach of ethics.even there is material fact that waterfalls having a cleanup liability the auditor given a qualifying report which is not ethical. So Ecopark can sue against the auditor.
  3. The auditor can defend only saying that he made audit based the on material fact presented to him or up to the material facts known to him So he can defend the suit by saying waterfalls does not provide material information and mislead him. According to facts and documents provided to him, the financial statement provided a fair value.  

Related Solutions

7. Boston’s Dairy has just opened its main yogurt factory in upstate Massachusetts. This main factory...
7. Boston’s Dairy has just opened its main yogurt factory in upstate Massachusetts. This main factory can produce 3,500 boxes of yogurt monthly (each box contains twelve 6-oz cups). Due to overwhelming demand for the company’s product Boston’s Dairy had signed a contract to rent a new factory, which can produce up to 8,000 boxes per month. The monthly total fixed costs are $40,000 in the main factory and $18,000 in the new factory. The variable product cost of yogurt...
Boston’s Dairy has just opened its main yogurt factory in upstate Massachusetts. This main factory can...
Boston’s Dairy has just opened its main yogurt factory in upstate Massachusetts. This main factory can produce 3,500 boxes of yogurt monthly (each box contains twelve 6-oz cups). Due to overwhelming demand for the company’s product, Boston’s Dairy has signed a contract to rent a new factory, which can produce up to 8,000 boxes per month. The monthly total fixed costs are $40,000 in the main factory and $16,000 in the new factory. The variable production cost of yogurt is...
Victoria Company purchased a $100,000 conveyor belt for use in its main factory. It has a...
Victoria Company purchased a $100,000 conveyor belt for use in its main factory. It has a 4 year useful life and a $0 salvage value. For the following 4 years Victoria recorded sales revenue of $300,000 each year and $200,000 in expenses, NOT INCLUDING DEPRECIATION nor INCOME TAX EXPENSE. Victoria uses straight-line depreciation method for financial accounting (“book”) purposes and MACRS for tax accounting purposes. Under MACRS, Victoria can apply accelerated depreciation for the asset using the following percentages: YEAR...
Dysxa Co is looking to expand the capacity of an existing factory in its Alpha Division...
Dysxa Co is looking to expand the capacity of an existing factory in its Alpha Division by 850,000 units per year in order to meet increased demand for one of its products. The expansion will cost $3.2 million. The selling price of the product is $3.10 per unit and variable costs of production are $1.10 per unit, both in current price terms. Selling price inflation of 3% per year and variable cost inflation of 6% per year are expected. Nominal...
Karl inc. has an opportunity to expand one of its production facilities at a cost of...
Karl inc. has an opportunity to expand one of its production facilities at a cost of $425000. If the expansion is undertaken Karl inc. expects their income will increase by $102000 the first year and then increase by $6000 each year after that. The annual expenses are expected to be $10000 the first year and increase by $1500 each year after that. The company will depreciate the equipment using a 5 year MACRS (20%, 32%, 19.2%, 11.52%, 11.52%, and 5.75%)...
A factory worker’s union is appealing to the factory management for more vacation time for its...
A factory worker’s union is appealing to the factory management for more vacation time for its employees. The union claims that the workers are more productive when they come back from vacation than before (in other words, that production rate and vacation status are related). The following table contains the production rates, measured in units per hour, for a sample of employees. The union feels that it needs to be 90% confident (level of significance = 0.10) before going into...
A piece of laborsaving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could...
A piece of laborsaving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could use to reduce costs in one of its plants in Japan. Relevant data relating to the equipment follow:      Purchase cost of the equipment $ 530,000   Annual cost savings that will be     provided by the equipment $ 100,000   Life of the equipment 10 years     Required: 1-a. Compute the payback period for the equipment. Payback Period Choose Numerator: / Choose Denominator: = Payback Period...
A piece of laborsaving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could...
A piece of laborsaving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could use to reduce costs in one of its plants in Japan. Relevant data relating to the equipment follow:      Purchase cost of the equipment $ 270,000   Annual cost savings that will be     provided by the equipment $ 60,000   Life of the equipment 12 years     Required: 1-a. Compute the payback period for the equipment. Payback Period Choose Numerator: / Choose Denominator: = Payback Period...
A piece of labor-saving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could...
A piece of labor-saving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could use to reduce costs in one of its plants in Japan. Relevant data relating to the equipment follow: Purchase cost of the equipment $ 392,000 Annual cost savings that will be provided by the equipment $ 80,000 Life of the equipment 10 years Required: 1a. Compute the payback period for the equipment. 1b. If the company requires a payback period of four years or...
A piece of labor-saving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could...
A piece of labor-saving equipment has just come onto the market that Mitsui Electronics, Ltd., could use to reduce costs in one of its plants in Japan. Relevant data relating to the equipment follow: Purchase cost of the equipment $ 484,500 Annual cost savings that will be provided by the equipment $ 85,000 Life of the equipment 12 years Required: 1a. Compute the payback period for the equipment. 1b. If the company requires a payback period of four years or...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT