In: Statistics and Probability
You are competing for a contract in a second-price auction. The cost for you to fulfill the contract is $10m. Check if each of the following statements is true. If not, change the statement to make it correct.
1. If with probability 0.4, the lowest cost of your competitors is $6m and with probability 0.6, it is $15m. Then your expected profit from the auction is $1.4m.
2. (4 points) If one of your competitors can fulfill the contract at cost $7m, then you are going to lose at least $3m.
3. (4 points) If 30% of chance that one of your competitors has a cost below $6m, 30% of chance that all of them have a cost above $16m, and 40% of chance all of them have a cost somewhere between $8m and $11m. Then your expected profit is at least $1.8m.
4. (4 points) If all your competitors inflate their ask prices above their costs by 10%, then you will be worse if you do not do so.
Theory: In second price auction you pay the price of lowest bidder in the market excluding you , that means,
statement (1) is true
statement (2) is true
statement (3) is false : Then your expected profit is at least
-$1.8m
statement (4) is false : then you will be better off irrespective
of your decision to increase/decrease price
Explaination :
1. Expected Price for winning the contract = 0.4* $6m + 0.6 *15m=
2.4+9=$11.4m
Expected Profit=11.4-10=$1.4m
2. Minimum cost in auction is atleast $7m , hence the company is
set to loose atlease ($10m-$7m)=$3m
3. Taking the worst case scenerio and assuming contract is taken
every time , Expected price for the contract :
Expected profit/loss=0.3*(-4)+0.3*6+0.4*(-2)=-1.2+1.8-2.4=$-1.8
4. In this context your profit/loss doesn't depends on how much price you set but on your competitors price. If all your competitors increase their prices then you losses will decrease and profits will increase irrespective of your decision to inflate the price.