A second price auction is one in which the object fr sale is sold to the...

A second price auction is one in which the object fr sale is sold to the highest bidder at the second highest bidder’s price. In an independent private values auction, show that it is a dominant strategy for a bidder to bid his true valuation.

Expert Solution

Auction theory was proposed by William Vicrey in 1961.

Sealed Bid Auction is very well known type of auction. In this a bidder submits his bid in the sealed envelope before deadline, without knowledge of opponent party. After deadline, the auctioneer declares the name of winning bidder.

There are two types of Sealed Bid Auction-

First Price Auction - The highest bidder wins, and pays the amount.

Second Price Auction - The highest bidder wins, and pays the amount bid by the second-highest bidder.

Independent private values auction

Sincere bidding (i.e., the truthful bidding of one’s own valuation) is a Nash equilibrium of the sealed-bid second-price auction, under private values. Sincere bidding is a weakly dominant strategy for each bidder; and sincere bidding by all bidders is the unique outcome of elimination of weakly dominated strategies. These facts make the sincere bidding equilibrium an especially compelling outcome of the second-price auction.

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago

Game theory: Analyze the second price" auction. There are two bidders and one object being sold...

Game theory: Analyze the second price" auction. There are two bidders and one object being sold by auction. Each bidder knows what the object is worth to him, but not what it is worth to the other bidder. In other words, the object is worth v1 to bidder 1 and v2 to bidder 2. Bidder 1 knows v1 but not v2, while bidder 2 knows v2 but not v1. In the sealed bid second price auction, each bidder privately submits...

Question 6. There are two bidders in a sealed-bid, second-price auction. The object for sale has...

Question 6. There are two bidders in a sealed-bid, second-price auction. The object for sale has a common value. Each bidder, i = 1,2, receives a signal i that is independently and uniformly distributed on the interval [0, 1]. The true value of the object, v, is the average of the two signals, v = (σ1 + σ2) / 2 (a) If bidder 1 gets the signal σ = 0.7, how much does he think the object is worth? (b)...

A second-price sealed-bid auction is an auction in which every bidder submits his or her bid...

A second-price sealed-bid auction is an auction in which every bidder submits his or her bid to the auctioneer, the auctioneer announces the winner to be the bidder who submits the highest bid, and the winner pays the highest bid among the losers. Is the following statement True, False, or Uncertain? Explain why. Every player has a weakly dominant strategy in second-price auction.

N players are bidding on an object in a first price auction. The object has a...

N players are bidding on an object in a first price auction. The object has a value of vi for each player i, where v1 > v2> ... >vn> 0. Each player bids secretly choosing nonnegative real number. The winner is the player who bids the largest number, and that player must pay the amount they bid. If it tie, then the player with the lowest index wins. Formulate this situation as a strategic game( describe the players, actions, and...

Second price auction is quite similar to a first price auction(each player bids secrectly choosing a...

Second price auction is quite similar to a first price auction(each player bids secrectly choosing a nonnegative real number) and each player i value the object viwhere v1 > v2 > ....>vn > 0, except that the winner pays the amount of the second highest bid. Prove that for player i, bidding vi is a weakly dominant strategy. That is, prove that regardless of the actions of the other players, player i payoff when bidding vi is at least as...

Second Price sealed bid-auction: Assume n players are bidding in an auction in order to obtain...

Second Price sealed bid-auction: Assume n players are bidding in an auction in order to obtain an indivisible object. Denote by vi the value player i attaches to the object; if she obtains the object at the price p her payoff is vi −p. Assume that the players’ valuations of the object are all different and all positive; number the players 1 through n in such a way that v1 > v2 > · · · > vn > 0....

You are competing for a contract in a second-price auction. The cost for you to fulfill...

You are competing for a contract in a second-price auction. The cost for you to fulfill the contract is $10m. Check if each of the following statements is true. If not, change the statement to make it correct. 1. If with probability 0.4, the lowest cost of your competitors is $6m and with probability 0.6, it is $15m. Then your expected profit from the auction is $1.4m. 2. (4 points) If one of your competitors can fulfill the contract at...

Two players compete in an auction to win an object. Players’ valuation for the object are...

Two players compete in an auction to win an object. Players’ valuation for the object are different: player i’s value for winning the object is vi , for i = 1, 2, with v1 > v2 > 0. These values are publicly known. The rules of the auction are the following: (a) Each player submits a bid bi ∈ [0,∞) to the auctioneer. (b) The player who makes the highest bid wins the object and pays the auctioneer bi ....

Consider a second price auction with 2 bidders, 1 and 2, who have values for the...

Consider a second price auction with 2 bidders, 1 and 2, who have values for the good of 20 and 80, respectively. Each knows what the other bidder’s valuation is so there is no uncertainty. (a) Show that choosing a bid equal to one’s valuation is a weakly dominant strategy for bidder 1. (b) Show that if each bidder plays a weakly dominant strategy, the bidder with the highest value always wins the good (c) Is it a Nash equilibrium...

Consider a second price auction for a single item with two bidders. Suppose the bidders have...

Consider a second price auction for a single item with two bidders. Suppose the bidders have independent private values, uniformly drawn in the interval [0, 1]. Suppose the seller sets a reserve price p = 0.5; that is, only bids above p = 0.5 can win. If a bidder bids above p and the other bids below p, then the first bidder wins and pays a price p. If both bid above p, then the highest bidder wins and pays...

Question