Question

In: Economics

A second-price sealed-bid auction is an auction in which every bidder submits his or her bid...

A second-price sealed-bid auction is an auction in which every bidder submits his or her bid to the auctioneer, the auctioneer announces the winner to be the bidder who submits the highest bid, and the winner pays the highest bid among the losers. Is the following statement True, False, or Uncertain? Explain why. Every player has a weakly dominant strategy in second-price auction.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A second-price sealed-bid auction is an auction in which every bidder simulatneously submits his bid to the auctioneer, the auctioneer announces the winner to be the bidder who submits the highest bid, and the winner pays the highest bid among the losers which would be the second highest bid.

This statement is true and this type of auction is also called as the Vickrey auction .

here the bidder who wins gets the bid at the price of the second highest bid.

A weakly dominant strategy is one where the player regardless of what other players decision is earns atleast as high a payoff as in any other case ie even if not strictly it is as good as in any other case.

lets take the case of two players b1 and vi

if b1>vi , we know that vi would be worse off playing any non-winning bid (including vi) than playing any other non-winning bid, and is strictly better than playing any winning bid

ie the payoff of vi is 0

next if b1<vi as long as vi is a non bwinng bid ie not tyhe highest bid , it has a 0 payoff again

but it would be a different case if it has a winning bid where playing this winning bid is as good as playing any other winning bid but it is strictly better than playing a non winning bid

next we see that vi= b1

where the player i receives 0 payoff anyways

so here playing no bid is as good as playing a bid


Related Solutions

Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the two highest...
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the two highest bids. As in the auction models considered in class, assume that players have valuations v1 > v2 > ... > vn, that ties are won by the tied player with the highest valuation, and that each player’s valuation is common knowledge. Is there any Nash equilibrium in which the two highest bids are different? If there is, give an example. If there is not,...
Game theory: Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the...
Game theory: Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the two highest bids. Assume that players have valuations v1 > v2 > … > vn, that ties are won by the tied player with the highest valuation, and that each player’s valuation is common knowledge. a. Is there any Nash equilibrium in which the two highest bids are different? If there is, give an example. If there is not, prove that no such equilibrium...
Second Price sealed bid-auction: Assume n players are bidding in an auction in order to obtain...
Second Price sealed bid-auction: Assume n players are bidding in an auction in order to obtain an indivisible object. Denote by vi the value player i attaches to the object; if she obtains the object at the price p her payoff is vi −p. Assume that the players’ valuations of the object are all different and all positive; number the players 1 through n in such a way that v1 > v2 > · · · > vn > 0....
Suppose a single good is being sold in a sealed-bid auction (no bidder can observe the...
Suppose a single good is being sold in a sealed-bid auction (no bidder can observe the bids of other bidders). The rules of the auction are such that the person who bids the highest value for the good wins, but the winner only has to pay the value of the second-highest bid submitted. Assume that there are three people bidding for the good (?=1,2,3), and each values the good according to: ?1=$12 ?2=$16 ?3=$3 where ??v_i is the maximum willingness...
Question 6. There are two bidders in a sealed-bid, second-price auction. The object for sale has...
Question 6. There are two bidders in a sealed-bid, second-price auction. The object for sale has a common value. Each bidder, i = 1,2, receives a signal i that is independently and uniformly distributed on the interval [0, 1]. The true value of the object, v, is the average of the two signals, v = (σ1 + σ2) / 2 (a) If bidder 1 gets the signal σ = 0.7, how much does he think the object is worth? (b)...
Find a Nash Equilibrium of the second price sealed bid auction that is different from [v1,v2,v3,....,vn]
Find a Nash Equilibrium of the second price sealed bid auction that is different from [v1,v2,v3,....,vn]
Consider 45 risk-neutral bidders who are participating in a second-price, sealed-bid auction. It is commonly known...
Consider 45 risk-neutral bidders who are participating in a second-price, sealed-bid auction. It is commonly known that bidders have independent private values. Based on this information, we know the optimal bidding strategy for each bidder is to: A. bid their own valuation of the item. B. shade their bid to just below their own valuation. C. bid according to the following bid function: b = v − (v − L)/n. D. bid one penny above their own valuation to ensure...
Consider a second-price sealed-bid auction. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10 and v2=10. Select all that apply....
Consider a second-price sealed-bid auction. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10 and v2=10. Select all that apply. (PLEASE EXPLAIN CHOICES COMPLETEY) a. One bidder submitting a bid equal to 10 and the other submitting a bid equal to 0 is a Nash equilibrium. b. Bidding a value b1 equal to her own valuation v1 is a weakly dominated strategy for bidder 1. c. Both bidders submitting bids equal to 0 is a Nash equilibrium. d. Both bidders submitting bids equal to...
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the seller draws one of the N bids at random....
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the seller draws one of the N bids at random. The buyer whose bid was drawn wins the auction and pays the amount bid. Assume that buyer valuations follow a uniform(0,1) distribution. 1. What is the symmetric equilibrium bidding strategy b(v)? 2.What is the seller’s expected revenue? 3.Why doesn’t this auction pay the seller the same revenue as the four standard auctions? That is, why doesn’t the revenue equivalence theorem apply here? Be specific.
a) Your company is bidding for a service contract in a first-price sealed-bid auction. You value...
a) Your company is bidding for a service contract in a first-price sealed-bid auction. You value the contract at $12 million. You believe the distribution of bids will be uniform, with a high value of $16 million and a low value of $3 million. What is your optimal strategy with 5 bidders? b) Your company is bidding for a service contract in a first-price sealed-bid auction. You value the contract at $12 million. You believe the distribution of bids will...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT