In: Statistics and Probability
Melanism in Moths. Melanism is the process by which animals produce melanin to darken body tissues and produce color variation. Researchers at Oxford University suspected increased levels of pollution in London may be influencing the evolution of Lepidoptera, a species of moth native to the area that took on one of two distinct camouflage schemes: "light" and "dark." They surveyed a sample of dark and light moths on birch trees and labelled each "conspicuous" if it was visible from 30 yards away or "inconspicuous" if it was not. The table below shows the number of moths of each color that were conspicuous and inconspicuous. Use this data to investigate the researchers' theory that increased levels of pollution might provide an advantage to "dark" moths over "light" ones.
Conspicuous | Inconspicuous | Total | |
Dark | 7 | 340 | 347 |
Light | 132 | 16 | 148 |
Total | 139 | 356 | 495 |
Conduct a test for the stated null and alternative hypotheses. Use ?α = and round numeric answers to four decimal places.
?0H0: The variables use of color and detectability are independent.
??HA: The variables use of color and detectability are not independent.
1. Calculate the test statistic for this hypothesis test. ? z t X^2 F =
2. Calculate the degrees of freedom for this hypothesis test.
3. Report the p-value for this hypothesis test out to four
decimal places.
p-value =
4. Based on the p-value, we have:
A. very strong evidence
B. some evidence
C. extremely strong evidence
D. little evidence
E. strong evidence
F. Reject ?0H0
that the null model is not a good fit for our observed data.
Result:
Melanism in Moths. Melanism is the process by which animals produce melanin to darken body tissues and produce color variation. Researchers at Oxford University suspected increased levels of pollution in London may be influencing the evolution of Lepidoptera, a species of moth native to the area that took on one of two distinct camouflage schemes: "light" and "dark." They surveyed a sample of dark and light moths on birch trees and labelled each "conspicuous" if it was visible from 30 yards away or "inconspicuous" if it was not. The table below shows the number of moths of each color that were conspicuous and inconspicuous. Use this data to investigate the researchers' theory that increased levels of pollution might provide an advantage to "dark" moths over "light" ones.
Conspicuous |
Inconspicuous |
Total |
|
Dark |
7 |
340 |
347 |
Light |
132 |
16 |
148 |
Total |
139 |
356 |
495 |
Conduct a test for the stated null and alternative hypotheses. Use ?α = and round numeric answers to four decimal places.
H0: The variables use of color and detectability are independent.
HA: The variables use of color and detectability are not independent.
1. Calculate the test statistic for this hypothesis test. ? X^2 = 390.3773
2. Calculate the degrees of freedom for this hypothesis test. DF= 1
3. Report the p-value for this hypothesis test out to four decimal places.
P value = 0.0000
4. Based on the p-value, we have:
C. extremely strong evidence
F. Reject H0
that the null model is not a good fit for our observed data.
Chi-Square Test |
||||||
Observed Frequencies |
||||||
Column variable |
Calculations |
|||||
Conspicuous |
Inconspicuous |
Total |
fo-fe |
|||
Dark |
7 |
340 |
347 |
-90.4404 |
90.4404 |
|
Light |
132 |
16 |
148 |
90.4404 |
-90.4404 |
|
Total |
139 |
356 |
495 |
|||
Expected Frequencies |
||||||
Column variable |
||||||
0 |
Conspicuous |
Inconspicuous |
Total |
(fo-fe)^2/fe |
||
Dark |
97.4404 |
249.5596 |
347 |
83.9433 |
32.7756 |
|
Light |
41.5596 |
106.4404 |
148 |
196.8130 |
76.8455 |
|
Total |
139 |
356 |
495 |
|||
Data |
||||||
Level of Significance |
0.05 |
|||||
Number of Rows |
2 |
|||||
Number of Columns |
2 |
|||||
Degrees of Freedom |
1 |
|||||
Results |
||||||
Critical Value |
3.8415 |
|||||
Chi-Square Test Statistic |
390.3773 |
|||||
p-Value |
0.0000 |
|||||
Reject the null hypothesis |