The primary weaknesses in BioGlass Inc's promotion policy
are:
- Communication: There is no clear definition of KASO's, they
should clearly define KASO's which should include skills,
knowledge, academic qualifications and abilities required to
perform a certain job. They should consider promotion only when
these demands are met. From the case study, it is clear that Tom
was not evaluated properly for the promotion. He was rather given
promotion due to his loyalty and good sales record.
- Promotion based on seniority: Bioglass gave promotion to Tom
based on his seniority and did not consider the fact that he did
not have previous experience in managing teams. BioGlass should
have given more weightage to prior experience and merit to avoid
this failure.
- Promotion without evaluating other candidates: Tom was the
natural choice for the position. The company had a bias in their
mind while selecting Tom. Had they evaluated other candidates, they
might have not suffered this failure.
Two solutions to address this weakness:
- Company should give weightage to previous experience, merits,
skills, knowledge etc. when considering for managerial position.
For this purpose, it is important to clearly define Job
description.
- Have a system for Internal Job posting where other internal
candidates can also apply, all of the candidates will be evaluated
for a particular role. This will help in identifying the right
candidate by making the process fair and transparent.
One method to prevent similar problems in future is employing
specialized staffing process and management training program for
the selected candidate. The program should prepare the candidate to
take up managerial roles without much hiccups and should ensure
smooth transition.