Question

In: Economics

Suppose a single good is being sold in a sealed-bid auction (no bidder can observe the...

Suppose a single good is being sold in a sealed-bid auction (no bidder can observe the bids of other bidders). The rules of the auction are such that the person who bids the highest value for the good wins, but the winner only has to pay the value of the second-highest bid submitted.

Assume that there are three people bidding for the good (?=1,2,3), and each values the good according to:

  • ?1=$12
  • ?2=$16
  • ?3=$3

where ??v_i is the maximum willingness to pay for the good for player ?i.

What is the Nash equilibrium bid for each player? Who will win the auction? How much will the winner pay?

Solutions

Expert Solution

This is the concept of second-price auction.

Nash equilibrium in this model is that every player bids his/her own value. By doing so s/he is at least as better off as any other strategy. This happens because the winner has to pay the second-highest price. So his utility will be positive if he wins. Now, reducing the amount of bid might make him/her lose the auction. Also bidding any price higher than his own value might lead to a negative payoff.

In this game, player 2 will win the auction, as he will bid 16 and it is the maximum bid among three players.

The winner(player 2) will pay $12 as this is second price auction.


Related Solutions

A second-price sealed-bid auction is an auction in which every bidder submits his or her bid...
A second-price sealed-bid auction is an auction in which every bidder submits his or her bid to the auctioneer, the auctioneer announces the winner to be the bidder who submits the highest bid, and the winner pays the highest bid among the losers. Is the following statement True, False, or Uncertain? Explain why. Every player has a weakly dominant strategy in second-price auction.
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the two highest...
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the two highest bids. As in the auction models considered in class, assume that players have valuations v1 > v2 > ... > vn, that ties are won by the tied player with the highest valuation, and that each player’s valuation is common knowledge. Is there any Nash equilibrium in which the two highest bids are different? If there is, give an example. If there is not,...
Game theory: Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the...
Game theory: Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the winning bidder pays the average of the two highest bids. Assume that players have valuations v1 > v2 > … > vn, that ties are won by the tied player with the highest valuation, and that each player’s valuation is common knowledge. a. Is there any Nash equilibrium in which the two highest bids are different? If there is, give an example. If there is not, prove that no such equilibrium...
Second Price sealed bid-auction: Assume n players are bidding in an auction in order to obtain...
Second Price sealed bid-auction: Assume n players are bidding in an auction in order to obtain an indivisible object. Denote by vi the value player i attaches to the object; if she obtains the object at the price p her payoff is vi −p. Assume that the players’ valuations of the object are all different and all positive; number the players 1 through n in such a way that v1 > v2 > · · · > vn > 0....
Problem 1. An “antique” table is for sale in a sealed bid auction. It will go...
Problem 1. An “antique” table is for sale in a sealed bid auction. It will go to the high bidder at the price the high bidder bids. You don’t know if it is a fake or not, but you do know that 20% of all antiques that look like this one are fakes. You are not able to have an appraiser examine it. If it is a fake, you will know this after you buy it and it will be...
Two buyers bid in an auction for a single object. Each can bid any integer amount...
Two buyers bid in an auction for a single object. Each can bid any integer amount from $0 to $10. The two bids are made simultaneously and independently of each other. The buyers’ respective values are v1 = 5 and v2 = 10. The bidder with the higher bid wins (obtains the object) and pays the amount of his own bid. However, the bidder who does not win the auction and thus does not get the object is also obliged...
Two buyers bid in an auction for a single object. Each can bid any integer amount...
Two buyers bid in an auction for a single object. Each can bid any integer amount from $0 to $10. The two bids are made simultaneously and independently of each other. The buyers’ respective values are v1 = 5 and v2 = 10. The bidder with the higher bid wins (obtains the object) and pays the amount of his own bid. However, the bidder who does not win the auction and thus does not get the object is also obliged...
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the seller draws one of the N bids at random....
Consider a sealed-bid auction in which the seller draws one of the N bids at random. The buyer whose bid was drawn wins the auction and pays the amount bid. Assume that buyer valuations follow a uniform(0,1) distribution. 1. What is the symmetric equilibrium bidding strategy b(v)? 2.What is the seller’s expected revenue? 3.Why doesn’t this auction pay the seller the same revenue as the four standard auctions? That is, why doesn’t the revenue equivalence theorem apply here? Be specific.
Consider a second-price sealed-bid auction. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10 and v2=10. Select all that apply....
Consider a second-price sealed-bid auction. Suppose bidders' valuations are v1=10 and v2=10. Select all that apply. (PLEASE EXPLAIN CHOICES COMPLETEY) a. One bidder submitting a bid equal to 10 and the other submitting a bid equal to 0 is a Nash equilibrium. b. Bidding a value b1 equal to her own valuation v1 is a weakly dominated strategy for bidder 1. c. Both bidders submitting bids equal to 0 is a Nash equilibrium. d. Both bidders submitting bids equal to...
a) Your company is bidding for a service contract in a first-price sealed-bid auction. You value...
a) Your company is bidding for a service contract in a first-price sealed-bid auction. You value the contract at $12 million. You believe the distribution of bids will be uniform, with a high value of $16 million and a low value of $3 million. What is your optimal strategy with 5 bidders? b) Your company is bidding for a service contract in a first-price sealed-bid auction. You value the contract at $12 million. You believe the distribution of bids will...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT