Question

In: Computer Science

Prove that the language L={(M, N): M is a Turing machine and N is a DFA...

Prove that the language L={(M, N): M is a Turing machine and N is a DFA with L(M) =L(N)} is undecidable. You need to derive a reduction from Atm={(M, w)|Turing machine M accepts w} to L.

(In layman's terms please, no other theorems involved)

Solutions

Expert Solution

venereology answered 1 year ago
Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Show that the language F={M| M is a Turing machine , and L(M) contains infinite elements}...
Show that the language F={M| M is a Turing machine , and L(M) contains infinite elements} is not Turing recognizable.
Explain how a Turing Machine can simulate an arbitrary DFA. Use a 2-tape Turing Machine. It...
Explain how a Turing Machine can simulate an arbitrary DFA. Use a 2-tape Turing Machine. It can be done with a 1-Tape Turing Machine, but 2-tape will likely make the explanation more intuitive.
1.True or False: a)If a language L is recognized by a 2^n-state DFA, then it must...
1.True or False: a)If a language L is recognized by a 2^n-state DFA, then it must be recognized by some NFA with no more than n states. b)For every three regular expressions R, S, and T, the languages denoted by R(S∪T) and (RS)∪(RT) are the same. Please explain.
Can you give me a turing machine for the language c* n b*2n a* n+2 for...
Can you give me a turing machine for the language c* n b*2n a* n+2 for n>=0 . Please give the entire diagram with states, transition function, alphabet. Can use either one-tape or two-tape (both infinite). Describe the logic used to build the machine. Run the TM that accepts for any string of length > 1. Also run for string cbba.
prove or disprove A Turing machine with two tapes is no more powerful than a Turing...
prove or disprove A Turing machine with two tapes is no more powerful than a Turing machine with one tape. (That is, both types of machines can compute the same set of functions.) The cardinality of the set of irrational numbers is greater than the cardinality of the set of all rational numbers. The cardinality of the set of all algebraic numbers is exactly the same as the cardinality of all real numbers.
Draw an NFA for the following language then convert to a DFA: L = {w :...
Draw an NFA for the following language then convert to a DFA: L = {w : |w| is odd or |w| is a multiple of 4} where Σ = {0, 1}
Prove the language of strings over {a, b} of the form (b^m)(a^n) , 0 ≤ m...
Prove the language of strings over {a, b} of the form (b^m)(a^n) , 0 ≤ m < n-2 isn’t regular. (I'm using the ^ notation but your free to make yours bman instead of (b^m)(a^n) ) Use the pumping lemma for regular languages.
Prove that a single-tape Turing Machine that is not allowed to write on the input portion...
Prove that a single-tape Turing Machine that is not allowed to write on the input portion of the tape can only recognize regular languages.
Is the following language a regular language? ( Prove with pumping Lenma ) L = {...
Is the following language a regular language? ( Prove with pumping Lenma ) L = { o^n 1^n 2^n | n => 0} Define CFL pumping lemma
Define a Turing machine TM3 that decides language L3 = { w | w ∈ Σ*,...
Define a Turing machine TM3 that decides language L3 = { w | w ∈ Σ*, #a(w) = #b(w) } over the alphabet Σ = {a, b}. IMPLEMENT USING JFLAP NO PAPER SOLUTION
ADVERTISEMENT
Subjects
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Questions
ADVERTISEMENT