Question

In: Computer Science

prove or disprove A Turing machine with two tapes is no more powerful than a Turing...

prove or disprove

  1. A Turing machine with two tapes is no more powerful than a Turing machine with one tape. (That is, both types of machines can compute the same set of functions.)
  2. The cardinality of the set of irrational numbers is greater than the cardinality of the set of all rational numbers.
  3. The cardinality of the set of all algebraic numbers is exactly the same as the cardinality of all real numbers.

Solutions

Expert Solution

First statement is True. "A Turing machine with two tapes is no more powerful than a Turing machine with one tape." Though having two tapes it seems more powerful than single tape turning machines, but still they can be simulated by single taped turning machines and cannot calculate any more functions than single taped machines.

Second statement is also True. "The cardinality of the set of irrational numbers is greater than the cardinality of the set of all rational numbers." As cardinality of rational numbers is equal to that of natural numbers and hence is countable. If cardinality of irrational will also be countable then union of both rational and irrational will be countable too which is not. So, cardinality of irrational numbers is not countable. Hence, the cardinality of the set of irrational numbers is greater than the cardinality of the set of all rational numbers.

Third statement is False. We know that cardinality of transcendental numbers is same as that of the real numbers (Transcendental numbers are those which aren't algebraic numbers). And the point is that there are less number of algebraic numbers than the transcendental numbers. Hence the statement "The cardinality of the set of all algebraic numbers is exactly the same as the cardinality of all real numbers" is False.

If you have any doubt regarding the solution then let me know in comment. If it helps, kindly give an upVote to this answer.


Related Solutions

Prove or disprove that the union of two subspaces is a subspace. If it is not...
Prove or disprove that the union of two subspaces is a subspace. If it is not true, what is the smallest subspace containing the union of the two subspaces.
Prove that a single-tape Turing Machine that is not allowed to write on the input portion...
Prove that a single-tape Turing Machine that is not allowed to write on the input portion of the tape can only recognize regular languages.
Prove that the language L={(M, N): M is a Turing machine and N is a DFA...
Prove that the language L={(M, N): M is a Turing machine and N is a DFA with L(M) =L(N)} is undecidable. You need to derive a reduction from Atm={(M, w)|Turing machine M accepts w} to L. (In layman's terms please, no other theorems involved)
Prove or disprove: two consecutive rotations about two different axis are commutative. That is, is RuRv...
Prove or disprove: two consecutive rotations about two different axis are commutative. That is, is RuRv = RvRu? (Hint: For simplicity, you can assume that the axis u is the x-axis and v is the y-axis without loss of gnerality).
Prove or disprove: two consecutive rotations about two different axis are commutative. That is, is RuRv...
Prove or disprove: two consecutive rotations about two different axis are commutative. That is, is RuRv = RvRu? (Hint: For simplicity, you can assume that the axis u is the x-axis and v is the y-axis without loss of generality).
Design a Turing machine that, given a positive binary number n greater than or equal to...
Design a Turing machine that, given a positive binary number n greater than or equal to 2, subtracts 2 from this number. Test it, step-by-step, on the example of n = 2.
Explain how a Turing Machine can simulate an arbitrary DFA. Use a 2-tape Turing Machine. It...
Explain how a Turing Machine can simulate an arbitrary DFA. Use a 2-tape Turing Machine. It can be done with a 1-Tape Turing Machine, but 2-tape will likely make the explanation more intuitive.
Prove or disprove if B is a proper subset of A and there is a bijection...
Prove or disprove if B is a proper subset of A and there is a bijection from A to B then A is infinite
Prove or disprove the statements: (a) If x is a real number such that |x +...
Prove or disprove the statements: (a) If x is a real number such that |x + 2| + |x| ≤ 1, then x 2 + 2x − 1 ≤ 2. (b) If x is a real number such that |x + 2| + |x| ≤ 2, then x 2 + 2x − 1 ≤ 2. (c) If x is a real number such that |x + 2| + |x| ≤ 3, then x 2 + 2x − 1 ≤ 2....
prove or disprove: every coset of xH is a subgroup of G
prove or disprove: every coset of xH is a subgroup of G
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT