In: Finance
In this paper, please discuss the following case study. In doing so, explain your approach to the problem, support your approach with references, and execute your approach. Provide an answer to the case study’s questions with a recommendation.
You and your lifelong friend are partners together in the promotional materials business. That is, when marketing firms and their clients begin advertising or public relations campaigns, they come to your company to obtain the materials and products that would support the ad campaign. Examples of the materials and products you supply are printed posters, signs, T-shirts with printed logos, key chains, and other such items. You supply these items by procuring them from other sources or in some cases you manufacture them using various equipment in a warehouse you use near the center of the city. Your company’s name is WePROMOTE.
You and your business partner are planning the next major project for your company. The project is a significant step in the growth of your firm in that the project will generate cash inflows into the firm for many years into the future. However, there will be a large investment of funds required by the firm to launch the project. The planning is in its preliminary stages where the numbers and other data are gross estimates. Despite the “fuzzy numbers”, you and your partner still need to decide whether the project will be worth pursuing.
The following is some of the estimated data you have:
You trust your partner’s instincts and agree to start analyzing the feasibility of the project. The first step is to perform net present value (NPV) calculations for the project using your partner’s estimates and then using your estimates.
Requirements of the paper:
Papers will be assessed using the following criteria:
AMOUNT IN $ | |||||||||
PARTICULARS | YEAR 0 | YEAR 1 | YEAR 2 | YEAR 3 | YEAR 4 | YEAR 5 | YEAR 6 | YEAR 7 | TOTAL |
COST OF EQUIPMENT | -80000 | -80000 | |||||||
14000 | 14000 | 14000 | 14000 | 14000 | 14000 | 14000 | |||
PV FACTOR 7% | 1 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.62 | |
1 ST YEAR 1/(1+.07) AND NEXT YEAR | |||||||||
( PRIVIOUS YEAR FACTOR/(1+.07) | 13084.11215 | 12228.14 | 11428.17 | 10680.53 | 9981.807 | 9328.791 | 8718.496 | 75450.05162 | |
SCRAP VALUE AT 7 YEAR END | 5000 | ||||||||
PV FACTOR | 3113.749 | 3113.748709 | |||||||
TOTAL VALUE OF CASH INFLOW | 78563.80033 | ||||||||
NPV | -1436.199667 | ||||||||
As per the above the npv shows negative and on the basis of this data the project is not feasible. | |||||||||
AMOUNT IN $ | |||||||||
PARTICULARS | YEAR 0 | YEAR 1 | YEAR 2 | YEAR 3 | YEAR 4 | YEAR 5 | YEAR 6 | YEAR 7 | TOTAL |
COST OF EQUIPMENT | -80000 | -80000 | |||||||
14000 | 16000 | 16000 | 16000 | 17000 | 17000 | 17000 | |||
PV FACTOR 7% | 1 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.62 | |
1 ST YEAR 1/(1+.07) AND NEXT YEAR | |||||||||
( PRIVIOUS YEAR FACTOR/(1+.07) | 13084.11215 | 13975.02 | 13060.77 | 12206.32 | 12120.77 | 11327.82 | 10586.75 | 86361.54969 | |
SCRAP VALUE AT 7 YEAR END | 5000 | ||||||||
PV FACTOR | 3113.749 | 3113.748709 | |||||||
TOTAL VALUE OF CASH INFLOW | 89475.2984 | ||||||||
NPV | 9475.298402 | ||||||||
RETURN ON INVESTMENT | 11.84% | ||||||||
But as per our calculation the NPV of the project is positive and shows a contribution of 9475 . That is an yield of 11.84% | |||||||||
May be some changes will happened regarding cash inflow, the assumption fixed cash inflow of $14000 is not a feasible situation , because | |||||||||
every project has a life cycle of introduction, growth, retardation, the cash flow will incrase a littile higher than introduction stage | |||||||||
May be some redutcion in the final stage, here the equipment will salvaged in year 7 but it is not mentioned that the product also outdatde in that year | |||||||||
Similarly tax effect on depreciation also not considered , that also may show have some savings part in the workings | |||||||||
WE also considered inflation in the currenecy | |||||||||
So as per my openion we should choose the project. |