In: Economics
Do you find the traditional or the Ricardian view of government debt more credible? Why?
Today the Ricardian model of government debt is more relevant
and credible than the tradition view of government debt.
The Ricardian view was named after the David Ricardo, who was
celebrated for the contribution of theoretical arguement.
The Ricardian view of public debt use the logic of forward looking
consumer to examine the impact of fiscal policy. The consumer may
concieve that as the government is minimising taxes without
reducing the government expenditure and by this it would not
increase their permanent income. The government is allowing a
budget deficit by financing the tax cut, which ultimately mean
that, in the future the government will have to increase the taxes
to pay-off the debt and the climbed interest. Which means that a
decrease in tax today linked with a tax hike in the coming days. A
decrease in the tax rate reschedules the burden and it does not
decrease the burden.
While in the traditional view of public debt seem that a decrease
in tax energize the consumer spending and reduces the national
saving. The reduction in saving increase the interest rate, which
ultimately force out the investment. (Keynesian model)
PLEASE GIVE AN UP VOTE IF YOU ARE SATISFIED WITH MY ANSWER.THANK
YOU!