In: Economics
| 
 Group  | 
 Products  | 
 Development Costs, $  | 
 Annual Net Cash Inflow, $  | 
| 
 A  | 
 1  | 
 500,000  | 
 90,000  | 
| 
 2  | 
 650,000  | 
 110,000  | 
|
| 
 3  | 
 700,000  | 
 115,000  | 
|
| 
 B  | 
 4  | 
 600,000  | 
 105,000  | 
| 
 5  | 
 675,000  | 
 112,000  | 
|
| 
 C  | 
 6  | 
 800,000  | 
 150,000  | 
| 
 7  | 
 1,000,000  | 
 175,000  | 
PW of each product is computed as follows.
PW, Product 1 ($) = - 500,000 + 90,000 x P/A(10%, 10) = - 500,000 + 90,000 x 6.1446 = - 500,000 + 553,014 = 53,014
PW, Product 2 ($) = -650,000 + 110,000 x P/A(10%, 10) = -650,000 + 110,000 x 6.1446 = -650,000 + 675,906 = 25,906
PW, Product 3 ($) = -700,000 + 115,000 x P/A(10%, 10) = -700,000 + 115,000 x 6.1446 = -700,000 + 706,629 = 6,629
PW, Product 4 ($) = -600,000 + 105,000 x P/A(10%, 10) = -600,000 + 105,000 x 6.1446 = -600,000 + 645,183 = 45,183
PW, Product 5 ($) = -675,000 + 112,000 x P/A(10%, 10) = -675,000 + 112,000 x 6.1446 = -675,000 + 688,195 = 13,195
PW, Product 6 ($) = -800,000 + 150,000 x P/A(10%, 10) = -800,000 + 150,000 x 6.1446 = -800,000 + 921,690 = 121,690
PW, Product 7 ($) = -1,000,000 + 175,000 x P/A(10%, 10) = -1,000,000 + 175,000 x 6.1446 = -1,000,000 + 1,075,305
= 75,305
Therefore the product can be ordered in descending order of PW:
6 > 7 > 1 > 4 > 2 > 5 > 3.
If products 6 and 7 are selected, total outlay (= 1,000,000 + 800,000 = 1,800,000) exceeds the budget of $1,500,000. Therefore, products 6 and 1 are selected since their total outlay (= 1,000,000 + 500,000 = 1,500,000) equals the budget of $1,500,000, they have the highest PW.