In: Accounting
Alternative Inventory Methods
Garrett Company has the following transactions during the months of April and May:
Date | Transaction | Units | Cost/Unit |
April 1 | Balance | 300 | |
17 | Purchase | 200 | $5.10 |
25 | Sale | 150 | |
28 | Purchase | 100 | 5.70 |
May 5 | Purchase | 250 | 5.10 |
18 | Sale | 300 | |
22 | Sale | 50 |
The cost of the inventory on April 1 is $5, $4, and $2 per unit, respectively, under the FIFO, average, and LIFO cost flow assumptions.
Required:
1. Compute the inventories at the end of each month and the cost of goods sold for each month for the following alternatives:
Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | |
April | $ | $ |
May | $ | $ |
Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | |
April | $ | $ |
May | $ | $ |
Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | |
April | $ | $ |
May | $ | $ |
Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | |
April | $ | $ |
May | $ | $ |
Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | |
April | $ | $ |
May | $ | $ |
Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory | |
April | $ | $ |
May | $ | $ |
2. Reconcile the difference between the LIFO
periodic and the LIFO perpetual results. If an amount is zero,
enter "0".
April | Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory |
Difference | $ | $ |
May | Cost of Goods Sold | Ending Inventory |
Difference | $ | $ |
3. If Garrett uses IFRS, which of the previous alternatives would be acceptable, and why?
If Garrett Company uses IFRS, it may report its inventory under . It may not use under IFRS because it is not consistent with any presumed physical flow of inventory. Also, is not allowed for tax purposes in most other countries, so there is no tax incentive for a company to use . Note that companies that use IFRS and have rising inventory costs will report a higher income because they include holding gains in income.
a. FIFO periodic | ||
COGS | End.Inv. | |
April | 750 | 2340 |
May | 1770 | 1845 |
b. FIFO perpetual | ||
COGS | End.Inv. | |
April | 750 | 2340 |
May | 1770 | 1845 |
c. LIFO periodic | ||
COGS | End.Inv. | |
April | 825 | 1365 |
May | 1785 | 855 |
d.LIFO perpetual | ||
COGS | End.Inv. | |
April | 765 | 1425 |
May | 1845 | 855 |
e. Weighted av. | ||
COGS | End.Inv. | |
April | 697.5 | 2092.5 |
May | 1683.75 | 1683.75 |
f.Moving average | ||
COGS | End.Inv. | |
April | 666 | 2124 |
May | 1699.5 | 1699.5 |
2.. | ||||
LIFO | Periodic-Perpetual | |||
April | COGS | Ending Inventory | ||
Difference | 825-765= | 60 | 1365-1425= | -60 |
May | COGS | Ending Inventory | ||
Difference | 1785-1845= | -60 | 855-855= | 0 |
3. If Garrett uses IFRS, which of the previous alternatives would be acceptable, and why? |
If Garrett Company uses IFRS, it may report its inventory under FIFO or weighted average method. It may not use LIFO under IFRS because it is not consistent with any presumed physical flow of inventory. Also,LIFO method of valuation is not allowed for tax purposes in most other countries, so there is no tax incentive for a company to use LIFO. Note that companies that use IFRS and have rising inventory costs will report a higher income because they include holding gains in income |
WORKINGS:
Units | Apr | May |
Gds.Av.for Sale | 600 | 700 |
Gds.Sold | 150 | 350 |
End./Inv. | 450 | 350 |
a. FIFO periodic | ||
April | ||
COGAS | ((300*5)+(200*5.10)+(100*5.7))= | 3090 |
COGS | 150*5= | 750 |
Ending Inv. | ((150*5)+(200*5.10)+(100*5.7))= | 2340 |
May | ||
COGAS | ((150*5)+(200*5.10)+(100*5.7))+(250*5.1)= | 3615 |
COGS | ((150*5)+(200*5.10)= | 1770 |
Ending Inv. | (100*5.7)+(250*5.1)= | 1845 |
b. FIFO perpetual | ||
April | ||
COGAS | ((300*5)+(200*5.10)+(100*5.7))= | 3090 |
COGS | 150*5= | 750 |
Ending Inv. | ((150*5)+(200*5.10)+100*5.7)= | 2340 |
May | ||
COGAS | ((150*5)+(200*5.10)+(100*5.7))+(250*5.1)= | 3615 |
COGS | (150*5)+(150*5.10)+(50*5.10)= | 1770 |
Ending Inv. | (100*5.7)+(250*5.1)= | 1845 |
c. LIFO periodic | ||
April | ||
COGAS | ((300*2)+(200*5.10)+(100*5.7))= | 2190 |
COGS | (100*5.7)+(50*5.1)= | 825 |
Ending Inv. | (300*2)+(150*5.10)= | 1365 |
May | ||
COGAS | (300*2)+(150*5.10)+(250*5.1)= | 2640 |
COGS | (250*5.1)+(50*5.1)+(50*5.1)= | 1785 |
Ending Inv. | (300*2)+(50*5.10)= | 855 |
d. LIFO perpetual | ||
April | ||
COGAS | ((300*2)+(200*5.10)+(100*5.7))= | 2190 |
COGS | 150*5.10= | 765 |
Ending Inv. | ((300*2)+(50*5.10)+(100*5.7))= | 1425 |
May | ||
COGAS | ((300*2)+(50*5.10)+(100*5.7)+(250*5.1))= | 2700 |
COGS | (250*5.1)+(50*5.7)+(50*5.7)= | 1845 |
Ending Inv. | ((300*2)+(50*5.10)= | 855 |
e. Weighted av. | ||
April | ||
COGAS | (300*4)+(200*5.1)+(100*5.7)= | 2790 |
COGS | 150*4.65= | 697.5 |
Ending Inv. | 450*4.65= | 2092.5 |
2790/600= 4.65 | ||
May | ||
COGAS | (450*4.65)+(250*5.1)= | 3367.5 |
COGS | 350*4.8107= | 1683.75 |
Ending Inv. | 350*4.8107= | 1683.75 |
3367.5/700=4.8107 | ||
f. Moving average | ||
April | ||
COGAS | (300*4)+(200*5.1)+(100*5.7)= | 2790 |
COGS | 150*4.44= | 666 |
Ending Inv. | (350*4.44)+(100*5.7) | 2124 |
((300*4)+(200*5.1))/500=4.44 | ||
May | ||
COGAS | (350*4.44)+(100*5.7)+(250*5.1)= | 3399 |
COGS | 350*4.8557= | 1699.50 |
Ending Inv. | 350*4.8557= | 1699.50 |
3399/700=4.8557 |