In: Physics
Two notes sounding “good” together sounds like a very subjective
statement. The songs we like and the sounds we like are incredibly
dependent on our culture, personality, mood, etc.
But there is something that feels fundamentally different about
certain pairs of notes that sound “good” together. All over the
world humans have independently chosen to put the same intervals
between notes in their music. The feeling of harmony we get when we
hear the notes C and G together and the feeling of disharmony we
get when we hear C and G flat together turns out to be part of the
universal human experience.
Instead of from subjective notions of “good” and “bad”, scientists
call the feeling of harmony “consonance” and the feeling
of disharmony “dissonance”. Some cultures and genes of
music use a lot more dissonance, but most humans perceive the same
relative amounts of dissonance between pairs of notes.
The most consonant pairs of sounds are two sounds that are
perceived as having the same “pitch” . In other words, the G key
below middle C on my piano is so consonant with the G string on my
guitar that they are said to be the same note.but to really answer
this question scientifically you need to look beyond acoustics and
examine how the brain processes musical grammar. Traditional
consonance/dissonance theories and psychoacoustics only explain why
notes sound good outside of a musical context; they don't tell you
anything about why they sound good in an actual piece of
music.
About a year ago, I attended a talk by a neuroscientist who studies
music. He had done some very interesting studies on people who had
underwent very specific trauma to the brain and lost the ability to
form coherent sentences. They still had their entire vocabulary,
but they no longer had the grammar to put words together. He
wondered whether they would also lose the ability to hear musical
grammar (as in, which notes sound good together, when does a
passage of music sound "complete" or "satisfying", etc).
His experiment was to play music for these people that fit the
normal standards of "sounding good" and "making sense" versus music
that used similar materials but was essentially randomly
constructed. The patients in the study could not distinguish one
from the other.
So from that, we see why musical grammar varies so much from one
culture to another, and why certain people think some music sounds
good while others can't stand it. What sounds good in music is a
learned grammatical process. Yes, consonance and dissonance play
some role on an atomistic level, but those rules are easily
overridden by context: there are highly dissonant passages in very
popular pieces of music from virtually any historical period and
geographical area.
As children, we learn what sounds good musically in the same way we
learn a language. We can also learn new musical grammars through
study when we get older (what most people would call "expanding
your tastes"). Either way, your brain needs to develop neural
pathways that reward "good sounding music" for you to get any
enjoyment out of it.