In: Accounting
Adirondack Corporation is estimating activity costs associated
with producing two different sized e-reader tablets. The indirect
labor can be traced to three separate activity pools. The budgeted
activity cost and activity base information, along with the
estimated activity-base information, is provided below.
ActivityCost Activity Base
Purchasing $250,000 Number of purchase orders
Materials handling $500,000 Number of moves
Production 1,350,000 Machine hours
TOTAL $2,100,000
Number of Purchase Orders; Number of Moves; Machine Hours; Number of Units
7” tablet 3,000 1,500 2,500 2,500
10" tablet 5,000 600 7,500 3,500
TOTALS 8,000 2,100 10,000 6,000
Required: Determine the Activity rate for each activity cost pool. All work must be shown for credit.
Please label your answer as the activity rate for: Purchasing; Materials handling; & Production.
Using the information from the activity based costing problem:
If traditional costing had been used and number of machine hours were the allocation base, what would the single allocation rate be? Would applying a single allocation rate be a wise decision to apply costs in this scenario? Why or why not
If traditional costing had been used and number of machine hours were the allocation base, what would the single allocation rate be? Would applying a single allocation rate be a wise decision to apply costs in this scenario? Why or why not?
No. of activity cost drivers |
|||||||
Activity |
Overhead cost |
Activity Base |
7" Tablet |
10" tablet |
Total no. of activity cost driver |
Activity Rate per cost driver |
|
[A] |
[B] |
[C] |
[D = B + C] |
[E = A / D] = Answer column |
|||
Purchasing |
$ 250,000.00 |
No. of purchase orders |
3000 |
5000 |
8000 |
$ 31.25 |
per purchase order |
Material Handling |
$ 500,000.00 |
no. of moves |
1500 |
600 |
2100 |
$ 238.10 |
per move |
Production |
$ 1,350,000.00 |
No. of machine hours |
2500 |
7500 |
10000 |
$ 135.00 |
per machine hour |
TOTAL |
$ 2,100,000.00 |
----Final Activity Rates for each cost pool activity, based on above working:
Activity |
Overhead cost |
Activity Rate per cost driver |
|
Purchasing |
$ 250,000.00 |
$ 31.25 |
per purchase order |
Material Handling |
$ 500,000.00 |
$ 238.10 |
per move |
Production |
$ 1,350,000.00 |
$ 135.00 |
per machine hour |
Working #1: Allocation of Overhead to 7" Tablets |
|||||
Activity |
Activity Rate per cost driver |
Activity Base |
No. of cost driver |
Overhead allocated |
|
[A] |
[B] |
[C = A x B] |
|||
Purchasing |
$ 31.25 |
per purchase order |
No. of purchase orders |
3000 |
$ 93,750.00 |
Material Handling |
$ 238.10 |
per move |
no. of moves |
1500 |
$ 357,150.00 |
Production |
$ 135.00 |
per machine hour |
No. of machine hours |
2500 |
$ 337,500.00 |
TOTAL Overheads allocated |
$ 788,400.00 |
||||
Total Units |
2,500 |
||||
Overhead cost per unit |
$ 315.36 |
Working #2: Allocation of Overhead to 10" Tablets |
|||||
Activity |
Activity Rate per cost driver |
Activity Base |
No. of cost driver |
Overhead allocated |
|
[A] |
[B] |
[C = A x B] |
|||
Purchasing |
$ 31.25 |
per purchase order |
No. of purchase orders |
5000 |
$ 156,250.00 |
Material Handling |
$ 238.10 |
per move |
no. of moves |
600 |
$ 142,860.00 |
Production |
$ 135.00 |
per machine hour |
No. of machine hours |
7500 |
$ 1,012,500.00 |
TOTAL Overheads allocated |
$ 1,311,610.00 |
||||
Total Units |
3,500 |
||||
Overhead cost per unit |
$ 374.75 |
A |
Total Overheads |
$ 2,100,000.00 |
B |
Total Machine hours |
10,000 |
C = A/B |
Overhead predetermined rate per machine hours |
$ 210.00 |
7" Tablet: |
||
D |
No. of machine hours |
2,500 |
E = C x D |
Overheads allocated |
$ 525,000.00 |
F |
Units |
2,500 |
G = E/F |
Overhead cost per unit |
$ 210.00 |
10" Tablet: |
||
H |
No. of machine hours |
7,500 |
I = C x H |
Overheads allocated |
$ 1,575,000.00 |
J |
Units |
3,500 |
K = I / J |
Overhead cost per unit |
$ 450.00 |
Overhead cost per unit |
||
7" Tablet |
10" tablet |
|
Traditional Method |
$ 210.00 |
$ 450.00 |
Activity based costing method |
$ 315.36 |
$ 374.75 |
Difference |
$ 105.36 |
$ 75.25 |
>If Traditional Method would have been used, the single predetermined Overhead rate would have been $ 210 per machine hours (as calculated in Step 3).
>Using this rate of $ 210 per machine hours would not be a wise decision to apply cost in this scenario because both tablet product consumes different amount of other ‘activities’ and cost of those activities should be in accordance with the amount of activities consumed (and not on the basis of machine hours only).
>If Traditional Method would have been used (See step 4):
---Overhead cost per unit of 7” tablet
would have been $ 105.36
LESS THAN the overhead cost per unit as per ABC
method.
--- Overhead cost per unit of 10” tablet would have been
$ 75.25 MORE THAN the
overhead cost per unit as per ABC method.
Hence, Traditional Method is NOT ADVISED.