Which of the followingbest describes Thomas Hobbes' version of the state of nature?Humans are...

Which of the following best describes Thomas Hobbes' version of the state of nature?

		Humans are neither good nor bad in the state of nature. They are only made good or bad due to their environmental conditioning
		Life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short
		Life is a perfect utopia that only became violent through the acquisition of private property and the development of civilization.
		While the state of nature is inconvenient, people act according to a pre-political "natural law"

Solutions

Expert Solution

Option D is an absolutely accurate answer.

Option D

Explanation:-

As per thomas human are cruel,bad and Thomas Hobbes portrayed his rule of the foundation of states and real experts among the Leviathan savant guaranteed the prerequisite for a solid central job to remain up a vital good ways from the pernicious human instinct and ordinary war. thinker conjectures ar the most reduced of understood getting theory.

Hayet Jeridi answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Is Thomas Hobbes’ picture of man in the state of nature and why it leads to...

Is Thomas Hobbes’ picture of man in the state of nature and why it leads to the social contract a true assessment of men’s basic psychology, why or why not?

According to Thomas Hobbes, what role does equality play in the state of nature?

Hobbes looked to the past to observe a primitive “State of Nature” in which there is...

Hobbes looked to the past to observe a primitive “State of Nature” in which there is no such thing as morality, and that this self-interested human nature was "nasty, brutish, and short" – a kind of perpetual state of warfare. Locke disagreed, and set forth the view that the state exists to preserve the natural rights of its citizens. When governments fail in that task, citizens have the right – and sometimes the duty – to withdraw their support and...

Hobbes introduces a rather bleak account of Human Nature and describes the “natural condition of mankind”...

Hobbes introduces a rather bleak account of Human Nature and describes the “natural condition of mankind” in detail. Briefly introduce each followed by a discussion of how, according to Hobbes, the state of nature (or the “natural condition of mankind”) arises as a consequence of his account of human nature.

1)For Hobbes, what is a contract? 2) Why are all contracts in the state of nature...

1)For Hobbes, what is a contract? 2) Why are all contracts in the state of nature potentially void? 3) What is the principle reason for the fact that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all?

How do Hobbes' and Locke's views of life in the state of nature differ? What implications...

How do Hobbes' and Locke's views of life in the state of nature differ? What implications do these differences have for each theorist’s proposal to exit the state of nature and establish a society (e.g. the social contract, the sovereign, government etc.)? Which theorist do you find more compelling?

Question