Question

In: Economics

Should the states take stronger measures against the federal government?

Should the states take stronger measures against the federal government?

Solutions

Expert Solution

No not at all. They should rather believe in cooperative federalism. If states act harshly against federal govt there will be anarchy. States and federal govt are two wheels of bicycle. If one punctures the second will be rendered useless automatically

Infact state govts in usa are more powerful than in almost all other federations. They have their own constitution, territory, identity, powers etc. On the other hand such features are missing in federations like canada and India. Furthermore reserve subjects fall in their domain unlike India and Canada. Not only this in some federations like India the central can declare national or state emergency and by doing so can take all administration in its own hands. Infact presidents rule in Indian states have been imposed quite often only because the central govt and state govt belonged to different parties. Even a simple law and order problem is used to impose presidents rule. Since 1950s it has been used more than 50 times. Compared to this we find states in usa powerful and strong. So no such action is warrented


Related Solutions

What measures government should take to reduce the corruption in the public sector?
What measures government should take to reduce the corruption in the public sector?
If the Federal government creates an unconstitutional law, should the states have to enforce it?
If the Federal government creates an unconstitutional law, should the states have to enforce it?
3.2  Should states be required to cooperate with the Federal Government in its policies in fields such...
3.2  Should states be required to cooperate with the Federal Government in its policies in fields such as immigration? Should the Federal Government withhold funding or assistance to states, counties or cities which refuse to follow Federal laws? Given national supremacy, is refusing lawful?
How much responsibility should the federal government take in guaranteeing its citizens a minimum standard of...
How much responsibility should the federal government take in guaranteeing its citizens a minimum standard of living? How much is too much? Should we move even further in this direction (such as national health care)? Or should we move back to placing more emphasis on the state, local government, or on the individuals, themselves?
Who has more power to regulate business- the states or the federal government? Who should have...
Who has more power to regulate business- the states or the federal government? Who should have more power?
ome states argue for block grants from the federal government to the states in lieu of...
ome states argue for block grants from the federal government to the states in lieu of federal money for expansion. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this argument?
What are some of the arguments for and against requiring the annual federal government budget to...
What are some of the arguments for and against requiring the annual federal government budget to be balanced
How are Tax exemption statuses monitored by the states and/or federal government?
How are Tax exemption statuses monitored by the states and/or federal government?
between the 1870s and the 1930s, the role of the federal government in the United States...
between the 1870s and the 1930s, the role of the federal government in the United States changed tremendously. How and why did the role of the federal government changed? What do you think were the most positive changes? What changes in the government's role made life in the United States worse?
Should the government be taking measures to strengthen the dollar, or should the dollar stay low?...
Should the government be taking measures to strengthen the dollar, or should the dollar stay low? Support your viewpoint with examples from the articles as well as external resources.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT