Question

discuss Blanchard and pearl’s model of resolving ethical dilemmas

Answer 1

Blanchard and pearl’s model suggest ‘it is easy to charge ahead without thinking and then rationalise your behaviour after the event. But the fact of the matter is THERE IS NO RIGHT WAY TO DO A WRONG THING”.

1. Gather the facts
2. Define the ethical issues
3. Identify the affected parties (stakeholders)
4. Identify the consequences
5. Identify the obligations (principles, rights, justice)
6. Consider your character and integrity
7. Think creatively about potential actions
8. Check your gut
9. Decide on the proper ethical action and be prepared to deal with opposing arguments.

1 - GATHER THE FACTS :-

•  Don’t jump to conclusions without the facts
•  Questions to ask: Who, what, where, when, how, and why.
•  However, facts may be difficult to find because of the uncertainty often found around ethical issues
•  Some facts are not available
•  Assemble as many facts as possible before proceeding
•  Clarify what assumptions you are making

2 – DEFINE THE ETHICAL ISSUE(S)

•  Don’t jump to solutions without first identifying the ethical issue(s) in the situation.
•  Define the ethical basis for the issue you want to focus on.
•  There may be multiple ethical issues – focus on one major one at a time.

3 – IDENTIFY THE AFFECTED PARTIES

•  Identify all of the stakeholders

 Who are the primary or direct stakeholders?

    Who are the secondary or indirect stakeholders?

•  Why are they stakeholders for the issue?

  Perspective-taking -- Try to see things through the eyes of those individuals affected

4 – IDENTIFY THE CONSEQUENCES

•  Think about potential positive and negative consequences for affected parties by the decision (Focus on primary stakeholders to simplify analysis until you become comfortable with the process).
•  What are the magnitude of the consequences and the probability that the consequences will happen.
•  Short term vs. Long term consequences – will decision be valid over time.
•  Broader systemic consequences – tied to symbolic and secrecy
•  Symbolic consequences – Each decision sends a message.
•  Secrecy consequences – What are the consequences if the decision or action becomes public?
•  Did you consider relevant cognitive barriers/biases?
•  Consider what your decision would be based only on consequences – then move on and see if it is similar given other considerations.

5 – IDENTIFY THE RELEVANT PRINCIPLES, RIGHTS, AND JUSTICE ISSUES

•  Obligations should be thought of in terms of principles and rights involved

 A) What obligations are created because of particular ethical principles you might use in the situation?

Examples: Do no harm; Do unto others as you would have them do unto you; Do what you would have anyone in your shoes do in the given context.

 B) What obligations are created because of the specific rights of the stakeholders?

 What rights are more basic vs. secondary in nature? Which help protect an individual’s basic autonomy?

    What types of rights are involved – negative or positive?

 C) What concepts of justice (fairness) are relevant – distributive or procedural justice?

•  Did you consider any relevant cognitive barriers/biases?
•  Formulate the appropriate decision or action based solely on the above analysis of these obligations.

6 – CONSIDER YOUR CHARACTER & INTEGRITY

•  Consider what your relevant community members would consider to be the kind of decision that an individual of integrity would make in this situation.
•  What specific virtues are relevant in the situation?
•  Disclosure rule – what would you do if the New York Times reported your action and everyone was to read it.
•  Think about how your decision will be remembered when you are gone.
•  Did you consider any relevant cognitive biases/barriers?
•  What decision would you come to based solely on character considerations?

7 – THINK CREATIVELY ABOUT POTENTIAL ACTIONS

•  Be sure you have not been unnecessarily forced into a corner
•  You may have some choices or alternatives that have not been considered
•  If you have come up with solutions “a” and “b,” try to brainstorm and come up with a “c” solution that might satisfy the interests of the primary parties involved in the situation.

8 – CHECK YOUR GUT

•  Even though the prior steps have argued for a highly rational process, it is always good to “check your gut.”
•  Intuition is gaining credibility as a source for good decision making – knowing something is not “right.” • Particularly relevant if you have a lot of experience in the area – expert decision-making.

9 – DECIDE ON YOUR COURSE OF ACTION AND PREPARE RESPONSES TO THOSE WHO MAY OPPOSE YOUR POSITION

•  Consider potential actions based on the consequences, obligations, and character approaches.
•  Do you come up with similar answers from the different perspectives?
•  Do the obligation and character help you “check” the consequentialist preferred action?
•  How can you protect the rights of those involved (or your own character) while still maximizing the overall good for all of the stakeholders?
•  What arguments are most compelling to you to justify the action ethically? How will you respond to those with opposing viewpoints?