Question

In: Economics

What four actions may an appeals court take when a trial court decision is appealed?

What four actions may an appeals court take when a trial court decision is appealed?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Most civil and criminal decisions of a state or federal trial court (as well as administrative decisions by agencies) are subject to review by an appeal court.Whether the appeal concerns a judge's order or a jury's verdict, an appeals court reviews what happened in prior proceddings for any errors of law. This means losing parties cannot appeal a case just because they are unhappy with the outcome; they may only challenge decisions that may have resulted from errors, such as a misinterpretation of legal precedent or reliance on evidence that should have been excluded.

If you are appealing a court decision or judgement, you will want to get a handle on how the process works. The following is an overview of court appeals.

The Basics of Appealing a Court Decision

If the court finds an error that contributed to the tribal court's decision,the appeals court will reverse that decision. The lawyers for the parties submit briefs to the court and may be granted oral argument. Once an appeals court has made its decision, the opportunity for further appeals is limited. As the numberof parties filing appeals has risen substantially, the state and federal court systems have implemented changes in an effort to keep up.

Trials vs Appeals

A trail and a appeal have a few similarities, but also many important differences:

Trials at a Glance:

At trail, the parties present their cases, calling witnesses for testimony and presenting other pieces of evidence,such as documents,photographs,reports,surveys,diaries,blueprints,etc. The jury weights the evidence and determines the facts of the case,that is, what they believe actually happened. A jury is therefore sometimes referred to as the "finder of fact".

The judge controls the activities in the courtroom and makes all the legal decisions,such as ruling on motions and on objections raised by the attorneys. The judge is often called the "finder of law". If the parties have choosen a bench trail,rather than a jury trail, the judge will make both findings of fact and findings of law.

Appeals at a glance

An appeal is review of the trial court's application of the law. There is no jury in an appeal, nor do the lawyers present witnesses or, typically, other forms of evidence. The court will accept the facts as they were revealed in the trial court,unless a factual finding is clearly against the weight of the evidence.

Another difference between a trail and and an appeal is the number of judges involved. A single judge presides over a trial. An appeal,however, is heard by several judges at once.How many depends on the jurisdiction. At the initial appeals court level, courts may have from three to a few dozen judges.

Yet on the larger courts, the full number of judges seldom hear claims together. Instead, appeals are typically heard by panels,often comprised of three judges. In rare instances, the full court may decide to grant a motion for rehearsing "en banc", when all the judges on the appeals court hear the case together and issue a new decision.Supreme Courts, at the state and federal level,have five to nine judges,referred to as judges.

Appellate Briefs

The main form of persuasion on appeal is the written appellate brief, filed by counsel for each party. With this brief,the party that lost in the trial court will argue that the trial court's decision was correct.Both parties will support their positions with refernce to applicable case law and statutes.

An appeal is a more scholarly proceeding than a trial. Whereas the litigator must be active strategist in the courtroom,calling witnesses,cross-examining, and making motions or objections,the appellate the lawyer builds his or her case in the brief,before the appeal is heard. Appeals often include a short period for oral argument,but the judges often consume this period with questions for the attorney,prompted by the briefs.

The "Record" on Appeal

Appeals court decisions turn on the record, which documents what happened in the trail court. The record contains the pleadings (plantiff's complaint and defendant's answer), pre-trial motions, a transcript of what occurred during trial,the exhibits put into evidence,post-trial motions,and any discussion with the judge that did not take place "off the record". The sucess of an appeal therefore depends on what occurred at trial. If an attorney failed to get critical,available evidence into the record,or to object to something prejudicial, the opportunity to do so is lost.

After Appealing a Court Decision

The party that loses in a state or federal appeals court may appeal to the state Supreme Court or the U.S Supreme Court (most states call their highest court "Supreme Court",though Maryland and New York call theirs the "Court of Appeals"). Review of these courts,however, is discretionary with the court. Because these courts receive many more requests for review than they can handle, they typically grant review than they can handle, they typically grant review only to cases involving unsettled questions of law.

Also, the U.S supreme Court can only review cases that raise some federal or constitutional issue;cases that concern state law exclusively are beyond its jurisdiction.At this point, the parties have already had the case reviewed once, reducing their tendency to see the decision as blased or contrary to law.


Related Solutions

Must the U.S Circuit of Appeals for the First Circuit follow a trial court decision of...
Must the U.S Circuit of Appeals for the First Circuit follow a trial court decision of the same circuit concerning a federal issue? Why or why not?
In deciding a case or appeal, identify and explain the actions which the court may take.
In deciding a case or appeal, identify and explain the actions which the court may take.
A decision from the U.S Court of Appeals in Philadelphia provides a good reason for directors...
A decision from the U.S Court of Appeals in Philadelphia provides a good reason for directors to resign from poorly managed companies to avoid personal liability, even if someone else is making the mistakes. The case indirectly stands for the proposition that board members can be liable for not firing incompetent managers. What were the bases for this outcome?
What type of authority is a decision of a Missouri trial court? Briefly explain.
What type of authority is a decision of a Missouri trial court? Briefly explain.
What procedural mechanism might the district court or court of appeals have used to dispose of...
What procedural mechanism might the district court or court of appeals have used to dispose of the Kadlec case without guessing what the Louisiana courts would do?
What are some of the limits that are placed on who may take cases to court...
What are some of the limits that are placed on who may take cases to court and the types of cases courts will consider? How does this differ between federal and state courts? This is one of the disussion questions in the book: Problems in Healthcare)
consider the four major reasons for new bussiness failure . What actions can enterpreneurs take to...
consider the four major reasons for new bussiness failure . What actions can enterpreneurs take to minimize or to avoid each cause of failure?
We take up first the question of whether the trial court erred in piercing the corporate...
We take up first the question of whether the trial court erred in piercing the corporate veil of On Top to hold Russell Nugent personally liable on plaintiffs' claims. Shareholder insulation from liability for corporate debts or obligations has been a cornerstone of corporate law in the United States since the 19th century. . Although courts will look through corporate organizations to individuals when necessary to prevent injustice, doing so is the exception rather than the rule, and, ordinarily, a...
What actions should the nurse take when performing oral care for a dependent client?
What actions should the nurse take when performing oral care for a dependent client?
Name the two remedies a court may award a plaintiff when no contract exists. What are...
Name the two remedies a court may award a plaintiff when no contract exists. What are the three elements for each of these two remedies?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT