In: Economics
Part 1: Suppose a project under consideration has the following stream of benefits and costs.
Year |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Costs |
$10,000 |
$6,000 |
$2,000 |
|||
Benefits |
$2,000 |
$4,000 |
$6,000 |
$8,000 |
$10,000 |
(a)Find the net present value of the project assuming a discount rate of 5%. Is the project worthwhile?
(b)Redo (a) assuming the discount rate is 10%. Would you recommend the project go forward?
(c)Suppose you have discovered that the benefits of the project have been overestimated and a more accurate assessment suggests that the benefit in each year is half of the original estimate. Assuming a discount rate of 5%, would you recommend the project go forward in this case? Briefly explain your answer.
Part 2: The government is contemplating a project that protects a wilderness area. The project is expected to produce annual net benefits of $100,000 into perpetuity. Assuming a discount rate of 8%, what is the net present value associated with this project?
Net present value (NPV) is the difference of present value of net benefits and the initial (year 0) cost.
Net benefit (NB) = Benefit – Cost
A project could be accepted, if it has positive NPV.
a.
NPV at 5% discount rate
Year |
NB |
5% discount factor = 1/(1 + 0.05)^n |
NB × factor |
0 |
0 – 10,000 = -10,000 |
1 |
-10,000 |
1 |
2,000 |
0.9524 |
1,904.80 |
2 |
4,000 |
0.9070 |
3,628.00 |
3 |
6,000 – 6,000 = 0 |
0.8638 |
0 |
4 |
8,000 |
0.8227 |
6,581.60 |
5 |
10,000 – 2,000 = 8,000 |
0.7835 |
6,268.00 |
NPV |
8,382.40 |
Answer: NPV is $8,382.40.
Answer: The project is worthwhile, since it has positive NPV.
b.
NPV at 10% discount rate
Year |
NB |
5% discount factor = 1/(1 + 0.05)^n |
NB × factor |
0 |
0 – 10,000 = -10,000 |
1 |
-10,000 |
1 |
2,000 |
0.9091 |
1,818.20 |
2 |
4,000 |
0.8264 |
3,305.60 |
3 |
6,000 – 6,000 = 0 |
0.7513 |
0 |
4 |
8,000 |
0.6830 |
5,464.00 |
5 |
10,000 – 2,000 = 8,000 |
0.6209 |
4,967.20 |
NPV |
5,555 |
Answer: NPV is $5,555.
Answer: The project is recommended, since it has positive NPV.
c.
If the benefit becomes ½, net benefits in each year would be as below:
Year |
Benefits, B |
Costs, C |
Net benefits [B – C] |
0 |
0 |
10,000 |
-10,000 |
1 |
1,000 |
0 |
1,000 |
2 |
2,000 |
0 |
2,000 |
3 |
3,000 |
6,000 |
-3,000 |
4 |
4,000 |
0 |
4,000 |
5 |
5,000 |
2,000 |
3,000 |
NPV at 5% discount rate
Year |
NB |
5% discount factor = 1/(1 + 0.05)^n |
NB × factor |
0 |
-10,000 |
1 |
-10,000 |
1 |
1,000 |
0.9524 |
952.40 |
2 |
2,000 |
0.9070 |
1,814.00 |
3 |
-3,000 |
0.8638 |
-2,591.40 |
4 |
4,000 |
0.8227 |
3,290.80 |
5 |
3,000 |
0.7835 |
2,350.50 |
NPV |
-4,183.70 |
Answer: NPV is -$4,183.70.
Answer: The project is not recommended, since it has negative NPV.
Explanation: Once benefits in each year go down, NB becomes low. This is the reason why NPV becomes negative.
Part 2: NPV at perpetuity would be as below:
NPV = Net benefits / Discount rate
= $100,000 / 0.08
= $1,250,000 (Answer)