Question

In: Psychology

Discuss correspondence bias and the actor–observer effect

Discuss correspondence bias and the actor–observer effect

Solutions

Expert Solution

Correspondence bias

In social psychology, correspondence bias is defined as the tendency of people to form opinions about other people based on their behavior and actions rather than the external factors such as the environment or situation they are in. It causes people to believe that a person behaves in a certain way because of his or her character. The notion that an action was the result of a certain situation is ignored, thus creating a bias.

For example, you have lost your way, and you ask a stranger on the road for directions. The stranger refuses to help as he is in a rush. You simply assume that the stranger is a selfish and rude person. You start believing that his behavior is indicative of his personality. Perhaps, he was getting late for a job interview or he was rushing to a hospital for emergency. Such external factors that may have influenced his actions are not taken into consideration. However, when you are in the stranger’s position, you consider it perfectly normal to react that way because of the situation you were in. This is correspondence bias.

Actor–observer effect

This is the opposite of correspondence bias. In actor-observer bias, a person blames his or her behavior on a situation rather than his or her personality. For example, if you are late to school, you blame the school bus or the alarm. You don’t attribute this to your qualities of laziness or tardiness. Thus, you attribute your behavior to a situation when you are the actor, and you attribute a person’s actions to his or her character when you are the observer. This is the actor–observer bias.


Related Solutions

What is the definition of fundamental attribution error, the actor-observer difference, and self-serving attribution. What is...
What is the definition of fundamental attribution error, the actor-observer difference, and self-serving attribution. What is an example of each term and discuss the outcome or result of each scenario based on the respective social cognition error.  
Please explain three of the following with regard to causal attribution: the covariation model, correspondence bias,...
Please explain three of the following with regard to causal attribution: the covariation model, correspondence bias, actor/observer difference, self-serving attributions
1-The healthy worker effect is a form of what type of bias? Selection bias Observation bias...
1-The healthy worker effect is a form of what type of bias? Selection bias Observation bias Interviewer/recording bias Recall bias 2-Which of the following alternative explanations should be ruled out in order to consider a study valid? Bias Confounding Random error All of the above 3-Which of the following define bias? The probability that the observed result is due to "chance" A systematic error in the design or conduct of a study that leads to an incorrect or invalid estimate...
Evaluate the effect of bias on performnace management systems.
Evaluate the effect of bias on performnace management systems.
Discuss bias in analysis and publication of epidemiologic research, and how to reduce such bias. Your...
Discuss bias in analysis and publication of epidemiologic research, and how to reduce such bias. Your response must be at least 200-400 words in length.
Assign the error or bias most fitting (confounding error, ecological fallacy, effect modification error, recall bias,...
Assign the error or bias most fitting (confounding error, ecological fallacy, effect modification error, recall bias, selection bias. Provide a thorough rationale for your assignment Provide a remedy to avoid the error or bias 200 women who were survivors of breast cancer, and 200 women from the community with no history of cancer, matched for age and parity, were surveyed about a variety of prior exposures that could have a relationship to the development of breast cancer. Several items, including...
The table shows population statistics for the ages of Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor winners...
The table shows population statistics for the ages of Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor winners at an awards ceremony. The distributions of the ages are approximately​ bell-shaped. Compare the​ z-scores for the actors in the following situation. Best Actor Best Supporting Actor μ equals=44.0 μ equals=49.0 sigma σ equals=6.7 sigma σ equals=14 In a particular​ year, the Best Actor was 37 years old and the Best Supporting Actor was 53 years old. Determine the​ z-scores for each. Best Actor...
With example, discuss the common bias/errors under inductive reasoning?
With example, discuss the common bias/errors under inductive reasoning?
Discuss and compare the fundamental attribution error and self-serving bias.
Discuss and compare the fundamental attribution error and self-serving bias.
Discuss the Bohr effect
Discuss the Bohr effect
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT