In Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public...

In Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because "separate is inherently unequal." Does this mean that schools should be legally required to have racially balanced student populations? In other words, should the racial composition of the school be required to match the racial composition of the surrounding area's population (i.e., if the county is 60% white, 30% Hispanic, and 10% black, should each school in the county be required to approximate those percentages in its student population?)? Why or why not?

Expert Solution

It is necessary to have a mixed culture followed when children grow up as this can sharpen their cognitive abilities. When the racial distribution is even with the students depending on the racial composition of the surrounding may help children to get many social benefits. Schools in America enroll students based on the socioeconomic integration policies. Some benefits are like students get better scores , they are likely to get enrolled for higher college education and less school drop outs . This helps students to achieve better than racial gaps as earlier the Latin and black students had poor achievements. One of the changes observed from the change of schools from segregation to integration has helped to reduce the SAT score difference between the racial. This also helps to students to do better critical thinking and improve life skills, creative skills and problem solving abilities.

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

how did the supreme court decision of the brown vs board of education mark the beginning...

how did the supreme court decision of the brown vs board of education mark the beginning of the end of the jim crow era in the south. cite evidnece.

14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency,...

14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency, and citizenship requirements set forth in the Constitution were a complete statement of Congressional eligibility standards and that the only way to add any eligibility requirements would be through a constitutional amendment. True or False 15) Each state is given a number of Electoral College votes equal to its combined number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate. True or...

Which of these was likely a problem with Obamacare? a. The Supreme Court ruled the individual...

Which of these was likely a problem with Obamacare? a. The Supreme Court ruled the individual mandate unconstitutional. b. The mandate is fairly weak, so some people will choose to not buy insurance. c. Zero states have agreed to do the Medicaid expansion. d. The law requires all employers to provide health insurance.

In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th...

In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th Amendment. Explain their reasoning.

On June 23, 2014 – in its Hobby Lobby decision – the Supreme Court ruled that...

On June 23, 2014 – in its Hobby Lobby decision – the Supreme Court ruled that requiring privately-owned corporations to pay for insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act violated a federal law protecting religious freedom. Please defend or refute the following statement: 5A. The recent US Supreme Court Hobby Lobby decision curtailing the availability of employer provided health insurance covering contraceptives – which are also prescribed for medical reasons other than preventing pregnancy – is a clear...

A supreme court from a certain region recently ruled that employees can be tested for drugs...

A supreme court from a certain region recently ruled that employees can be tested for drugs only if management has reasonable cause to administer the test. An article in a certain magazine focused on the misclassification rates of such drug tests. A false positive occurs when a drug test administered to a non-drug user yields a positive result. A false negative occurs when a drug test administered to a drug user yields a negative result. Complete parts a and b....

) In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students...

) In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating in competitive after-school activities such as athletics. Does drug testing reduce use of illegal drugs? A study compared two similar high schools in Oregon. Wahtonka High School tested athletes at random and Warrenton High School did not. In a confidential survey, 8 of 132 athletes at Wahtonka and 29 of 111 athletes at Warrenton said they were using drugs. Regard these athletes as...

In Roper vs Simmons, the US Supreme Court ruled that juvenile defendants can no longer be...

In Roper vs Simmons, the US Supreme Court ruled that juvenile defendants can no longer be sentenced to death in a capital trial. They cited information submitted by the American Psychological Association showing that age is correlated with impulsiveness (young people are often impulsive, a factor that might lead them to commit a homicide). Imagine the Court is unsure whether to categorize 16-, 17-, 18-, or 19-year-olds as adults or as juveniles. However, they do have an impulsiveness threshold. If...

Name three Constitutional issues that The Supreme Court has ruled on in the 21st century. Choose...

Name three Constitutional issues that The Supreme Court has ruled on in the 21st century. Choose the issue that you think is most important and relevant to legal psychology.

The Supreme Court ruled that Eastman Kodak Company must stand trial in an antitrust suit that...

The Supreme Court ruled that Eastman Kodak Company must stand trial in an antitrust suit that has important implications for the ability of manufacturers to control the markets for the parts and servicing of the products they make. Independent servicing companies that sell replacement parts and service for Kodak's line of sophisticated business machines contend that Kodak was trying to force them out of business by restricting their access to replacement parts and by trying to insure that customers for...

Question