Question

14 ) In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency, and citizenship requirements set forth in the Constitution were a complete statement of Congressional eligibility standards and that the only way to add any eligibility requirements would be through a constitutional amendment. True or False

15) Each state is given a number of Electoral College votes equal to its combined number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate. True or False

17) In Clinton v. City of New York, the Supreme Court ruled that: a) the line item veto granted to President Clinton was constitutional b) that the line item veto granted to Bill Clinton was unconstitutional, but that changes in the wording of the granting legislation could grant him this power c) that the line item veto granted to Bill Clinton was unconstitutional and the only way to grant him this power would be through a constitutional amendment d) that the line item veto could only be utilized by the President with a supporting resolution from Congress

18) Stewardship theory supports a limited view of presidential power and holds that the president can exercise no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power in the Federal Constitution or in an act of Congress. True or False  

Answer 1

Explanation:-

14.

In U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, the Supreme Court ruled that the age, residency, and citizenship requirements set forth in the Constitution were a complete statement of Congressional eligibility standards and that the only way to add any eligibility requirements would be through a constitutional amendment ; TRUE

15.

Each state is given a number of Electoral College votes equal to its combined number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate; TRUE

17.

that the line item veto granted to Bill Clinton was unconstitutional and the only way to grant him this power would be through a constitutional amendment

the correct answer is C

18-.

Stewardship theory supports a limited view of presidential power and holds that the president can exercise no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power in the Federal Constitution or in an act of Congress ; TRUE

If you have any dought about this answer dont give dislike ,tell us your dought in the comment then i can explain, Please rate me by giving me a like or thumb because it motivates me to do more work,Thank you.