Question

In: Economics

In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th...

In the Brown decision, the U.S. Supreme Court Decided that segregated public schools violated the 14th Amendment. Explain their reasoning.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The Thirteenth Amendment ended slavery; the Fourteenth Amendment granted citizenship to and protected the civil rights of former slaves; and the Fifteenth gave adult black men the right to vote. Unfortunately, the amendments alone proved insufficient to protect African Americans’ rights.Beginning in 1877, laws curbing the civil rights of Blacks began sweeping through Southern state legislatures. These laws became known as “Jim Crow” laws after a black minstrel character. Segregation became a legal requirement and not merely a cultural norm in every Southern state as well as some Northern ones. In 1896, Homer A. Plessy challenged a Louisiana statue necessitating separate rail cars for black and white passengers. Plessy claimed the law violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection clause, which requires that a state must not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

The Supreme Court disagreed with Plessy’s argument and instead upheld the Louisiana law. In the process, the Court established the doctrine of “separate but equal.” Though the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) decision never actually used that famous phrase, the ruling upheld the constitutionality of racially separate public accommodations as long as those accommodations were otherwise equal. The lone dissenting Justice in Plessy, John Harlan, objected to the majority’s decision: “in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law.”In 1954, sixty years after Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Brown v. Board of Education that “separate but equal” was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court cited a series of tests performed by two psychologists, Kenneth and Mamie Clark, demonstrating that segregation had a negative effect on the psyche of black children, instilling in them a sense of inferiority:To separate[children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to beundone.After the 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education declared state-mandated segregation in public schools unconstitutional, the case was re-argued to determine how to correct the violations. The Court ruled for Brown and held that separate accommodations were inherently unequal and thus violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause. The Court cited the psychological harm that segregation had on black children.It was the executive branch’s responsibility to enforce the decision, and it was up to state governments to actually implement integration in practice. Congress could have tied funding to states passing laws that banned segregation. The president could have issued an executive order or (as was the case with the Little Rock 9) federalize the state’s National Guard and have the troops escort the children to school.


Related Solutions

how did the supreme court decision of the brown vs board of education mark the beginning...
how did the supreme court decision of the brown vs board of education mark the beginning of the end of the jim crow era in the south. cite evidnece.
In Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public...
In Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because "separate is inherently unequal." Does this mean that schools should be legally required to have racially balanced student populations? In other words, should the racial composition of the school be required to match the racial composition of the surrounding area's population (i.e., if the county is 60% white, 30% Hispanic, and 10% black,...
In the Bank of New England Case, the Supreme Court determined that the Bank violated the...
In the Bank of New England Case, the Supreme Court determined that the Bank violated the currency transaction provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act because the Bank's customer, McDonough: Select one: a. made a single cash deposit of more than $5,000 and less that $10,000 on 31 different business days b. violated the anti-structuring provisions of the Act c. made multiple cash deposits each less than $10,000 but that totaled more than $10,000 on the same business day d. bribed...
In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided...
In Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case in which landowners challenged the power of a city in Connecticut to take their property for redevelopment. The redevelopment plan did not contemplate that all of the land would be open to the public. Parts would be privately developed. The plaintiffs alleged that the taking was unconstitutional because it was not for a public purpose. The Supreme Court rejected this claim. Use...
) In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students...
) In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating in competitive after-school activities such as athletics. Does drug testing reduce use of illegal drugs? A study compared two similar high schools in Oregon. Wahtonka High School tested athletes at random and Warrenton High School did not. In a confidential survey, 8 of 132 athletes at Wahtonka and 29 of 111 athletes at Warrenton said they were using drugs. Regard these athletes as...
ou are a Justice of the NSW Supreme Court. How will the High Court’s decision in...
ou are a Justice of the NSW Supreme Court. How will the High Court’s decision in Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community affect your future decisions regarding intention and the presumptions regarding social/domestic and commercial agreements?
Should Supreme Court Justices be appointed by the President or voted on by the public? Research...
Should Supreme Court Justices be appointed by the President or voted on by the public? Research a current supreme court justice. Give a brief biography of their qualifications to be a justice. What are two key court decisions that they have ruled in favor of? Explain why these decisions are important.
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current...
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, what is not to be considered "community" under the current test for determining if speech is obscene?
In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American...
In what ways was the U.S Supreme Court a party to the repression of African American lives and politics in the 1870s, 80s, and 90s? 400 words
In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating...
In 2002 the Supreme Court ruled that schools could require random drug tests of students participating in competitive after-school activities such as athletics. Does drug testing reduce use of illegal drugs? A study compared two similar high schools in Oregon. Wahtonka High School tested athletes at random, and Warrenton High School did not. In a confidential survey, 7 of 135 athletes at Wahtonka and 27 of 141 athletes at Warrenton said they were using drugs. Regard these athletes as SRSs...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT