Question

In: Advanced Math

1)  Recall, a truth table for a proposition involving propositional symbols p and q uses four rows...

1)  Recall, a truth table for a proposition involving propositional symbols p and q uses four rows for the cases p true, q true, p true, q false, p false, q true and p false, q false (in that order). For example  the outcome for p v ¬q  is  T, T, F, T  since the expression is only false when q is true but p is false. Of course, we have the same outcome for any logically equivalent proposition including ¬(¬p ∧ q), (¬p ∧ q) → false  and q → p. Of these, q → p clearly reduces the number of symbols to a bare minimum. Find "minimal expressions" for the other 15 possible outcomes, which are listed below:

a) FFFF

b) FFFT

c) FFTF

d) FFTT

e) FTFF

f) FTFT

g) FTTF

h) FTTT

i) TFFF

j) TFFT

k) TFTF

l) TFTT

m) TTFF

n) TTTF

o) TTTT

You may only use symbols from the set p, q, → , ∧ , ∨, (,  ),  ↔ , false,  true, ¬ .  Each of those count 1 toward the length of the expression. (Note:  falseand true still count as single symbols, even though they have multiple letters.) In some of the answers, your expression might have just p in it and not q or vice versa. Of course, there are also two answers that don't have either p or q in them!

Solutions

Expert Solution

page 2

Page 1

Thanks for your review


Related Solutions

Write a truth table for the proposition: ¬(q ∧ r) → (¬p ∨ ¬r). Consider a “1” to be true and a “0” to be false.
Write a truth table for the proposition: ¬(q ∧ r) → (¬p ∨ ¬r). Consider a “1” to be true and a “0” to be false.
Construct a truth table for the statement [q∨(~r∧p)]→~p. Complete the truth table below by filling in...
Construct a truth table for the statement [q∨(~r∧p)]→~p. Complete the truth table below by filling in the blanks. (T or F) p q r ~r ~r∧p q∨(~r∧p) ~p [q∨(~r∧p)]→~p T T T T T F T F T T F F
Prove or disprove using a Truth Table( De Morgan's Law) ¬(p∧q) ≡ ¬p∨¬q
Prove or disprove using a Truth Table( De Morgan's Law) ¬(p∧q) ≡ ¬p∨¬q Show the Truth Table for (p∨r) (r→¬q)
Type a proposition involving p, q, r and s that is true just when at least...
Type a proposition involving p, q, r and s that is true just when at least two of the propositional variables are true. For example, your proposition would be true in any case for which p and r are both true but false when, say, p is true while q, r and s are all false.
Discrete math question Prove that ¬(q→p)∧(p∧q∧s→r)∧p is a contradiction without using truth table
Discrete math question Prove that ¬(q→p)∧(p∧q∧s→r)∧p is a contradiction without using truth table
Write a C++ program to construct the truth table of P ∨¬(Q ∧ R) If you...
Write a C++ program to construct the truth table of P ∨¬(Q ∧ R) If you could include comments to explain the code that would be much appreciated!!! :) Thank you so much!
write a program that will print a truth table for p ^ ~q. Using C++ please.
write a program that will print a truth table for p ^ ~q. Using C++ please.
Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q...
Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q →∼ r p∨∼q ∼q→p ∴∼ r
Construct the truth-table for the following propositional formulas. In each case, explain whether the formula is...
Construct the truth-table for the following propositional formulas. In each case, explain whether the formula is a tautology, a contradiction, or neither. (Explain how you arrive at this conclusion.) (a) ¬((p → ¬p) → ¬p) (b) (p → (q ∧ r)) → (¬r → ¬p) (c) (p → ¬q) → ¬(¬p → q)
Two compound propositions p and q in propositional logic are logically equivalent if . . ..
Complete the following statements.Two compound propositions p and q in propositional logic are logically equivalent if . . ..An argument form in propositional logic is valid if . . ..A theorem is a statement that . . ..A statement that is assumed to be true is called a(n) . . ..A proof is a valid argument that . . ..
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT