Question

In: Accounting

In Harmon v. Delaware Harness Racing Commission, the plaintiff (Harmon) sued the Commission to be reinstated...

In Harmon v. Delaware Harness Racing Commission, the plaintiff (Harmon) sued the Commission to be reinstated in his job as Presiding Judge of harness racing. Explain why Harmon was suspended from his job, what promise was made to him and why the Commission refused to give him his job back. Further, the court noted that the Commission did not have a contract with Harmon to reinstate him, what legal theory did the court reference in finding in his favor and what are it's legal requirements?

Solutions

Expert Solution

In December 1998, the Commission hired Donald J. Harmon to serve as Presiding Judge. His job was to oversee both the racing and other racing officials.

Harmon was suspended because Harmon was charged with one misdemeanor and one felony based on Harmon's alteration of the judging sheet. When the Commission learned about Harmon's arrest, it suspended him without pay pending the outcome of the criminal case. He allegedly changed the judging sheet for a qualifying race as a favor to the horse's owner.

The commission had promised by Wayne, the Administrator of Racing during the relevant time period that Harmon would be reinstated as a Presiding Judge even if he is acquitted of charges. Harmon was acquitted of the criminal charges, and promptly asked Wayne to discuss with the Commission getting his job back. The Commission agreed to meet with Harmon and his attorney to consider Harmon's reinstatement. Ultimately, the Commission decided not to reinstate Harmon, and advised him by letter dated November 18, 2004

The court found that:-

The first issue is whether the Commission, as a state agency, can be held liable on a promissory estoppel claim. To prevail on a promissory estoppel claim, a plaintiff must establish that:

(i) a promise was made; (ii) it was the reasonable expectation of the promisor to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee; (iii) the promisee reasonably relied on the promise and took action to his detriment; and (iv) such promise is binding because injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise.

The trial court found that there was no promise because Wayne had no actual authority to transmit the Commission's decision to Harmon.

The second element of the claim is that the Commission reasonably expected Harmon to rely on Wayne's representations. If Wayne's testimony is credited, there is no real dispute about this point. The third element is that Harmon reasonably relied on the Commission's promise and took action to his detriment. Harmon testified that, but for the Commission's promise to reinstate him, he would have looked for other work in Delaware or another state. He was offered several horse training opportunities, but he could not pursue them because, if he did, he would not be allowed to return to his position as a judge for one year. Harmon also considered applying to be a judge in another jurisdiction, but decided that he could not start elsewhere and walk away from a new position as soon as he was reinstated in Delaware. This testimony, if credited by the jury, satisfies Harmon's burden of showing reliance to his detriment.

Reliance damages are intended to “assure that those who are reasonably induced to take injurious action in reliance upon the non-contractual promises receive recompense for that harm. Harmon testified that he did not look for or accept other positions during his suspension because he expected to be reinstated, and other positions would interfere with his ability to return to the position of Presiding Judge. Harmon's expert opined that he would have earned net compensation of $175,400 for the period from January 2004 until November 2005.

Harmon's expert said he lost about $270,000 based on two years of lost earnings and interest. The jury award of $102,273 was given to him.


Related Solutions

Arsenaux v. Arsenaux Plaintiff wife sued for a separation from her husband on the grounds of...
Arsenaux v. Arsenaux Plaintiff wife sued for a separation from her husband on the grounds of abandonment. Alleging freedom from fault, she sought alimony, and additionally sought custody of a minor child and child support. The husband reconvened seeking a divorce on the grounds of adultery. In order to establish his claim, the husband sought to prove that his wife had become pregnant some two years following his vasectomy and had thereafter obtained an abortion. His effort was frustrated by...
Your company is sued for job discrimination. Based on the hiring of 20 employees, the plaintiff...
Your company is sued for job discrimination. Based on the hiring of 20 employees, the plaintiff argues that only 20% of the newly hired candidates were minorities, when 28% of all applicants were minorities. To prepare for the lawsuit you need to decide if this is strong evidence that your company’s hiring practices are discriminatory. Follow these questions: Would you use a one-tailed or two-tailed test? Why? What would a Type I error be? What would a Type II error...
Your company is sued for job discrimination. Based on the hiring of 20 employees, the plaintiff...
Your company is sued for job discrimination. Based on the hiring of 20 employees, the plaintiff argues that only 20% of the newly hired candidates were minorities when 28% of all applicants were minorities. To prepare for the lawsuit you need to decide if this is strong evidence that your company’s hiring practices are discriminatory. Follow these questions: a. Would you use a one-tailed or two-tailed test? Why? b. What would a Type I error be? What would a Type...
Your company is sued for job discrimination. Based on the hiring of 20 employees, the plaintiff...
Your company is sued for job discrimination. Based on the hiring of 20 employees, the plaintiff argues that only 20% of the newly hired candidates were minorities, when 28% of all applicants were minorities. To prepare for the lawsuit you need to decide if this is strong evidence that your company’s hiring practices are discriminatory. Follow these questions: Would you use a one-tailed or two-tailed test? Why? What would a Type I error be? What would a Type II error...
The Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission increased the tool on the bridges on Route 22...
The Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission increased the tool on the bridges on Route 22 and Interstate 78 from New Jersey to Pennsylvania from $0.50 to $0.75 in December. In November, the Route 22 bridge had 519,337 crossings and the Interstate 78 bridge had 728,002. Suppose that the price elasticity of demand for the Route 22 bridge was .2696 and that for the Interstate 78 bridge was 1.556. (Assume nothing other than the toll change occurred during the months...
In May 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued the former top executives at Sunbeam, charging...
In May 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued the former top executives at Sunbeam, charging the group with financial reporting fraud that allegedly cost investors billions in losses. Sunbeam Corporation is a recognized designer, manufacturer, and marketer of household and leisure products, including Coleman, Eastpak, First Alert, Grillmaster, Mixmaster, Mr. Coffee, Oster, Powermate, and Campingaz. In the mid-1990s, Sunbeam needed help: its profits had declined by over 80% percent, and in 1996, its stock price was down over 50%...
v The City Commission of Nashville has decided to build a botanical garden and picnic area...
v The City Commission of Nashville has decided to build a botanical garden and picnic area in the heart of the city for the recreation of its citizens. The precedence table for all the activities required to construct this area successfully is as​ follows:                                                                                 Code Description Time ​(hrs) Immediate​ Predecessor(s) A Find​ location; determine resource requirements 20 None B Requisition of lumber and sand 60 A C Dig and grade 100 A D Saw lumber into appropriate sizes 30...
Who were the plaintiff in Snyder v. Louisiana 128 S. Ct. 1203 (2008) case? Who were...
Who were the plaintiff in Snyder v. Louisiana 128 S. Ct. 1203 (2008) case? Who were the defendants? What are the facts of the case? Procedural history? Issues (Question)? Holding (Answer)? Judgement? Reasoning? Concurrent and/or Dissenting opinion?
Carter v Indianapolis Power & Light Company and Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc 2005: Carter sued...
Carter v Indianapolis Power & Light Company and Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc 2005: Carter sued as personal representative for the estate of Jacobs. Jacobs was speeding and “jumping hills” when he crashed into a utility pole, spun out and crashed into another pole starting a fire in which he died. Carter sued saying companies were negligent in where they placed the poles. The court gave summary judgement to the defendants. Another odd one to be sure but can you...
According to the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System why might the...
According to the case of Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System why might the supreme court have a different worldview and a different perspective on the policy aspect of this issue?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT