Question

In: Operations Management

Who were the plaintiff in Snyder v. Louisiana 128 S. Ct. 1203 (2008) case? Who were...

Who were the plaintiff in Snyder v. Louisiana 128 S. Ct. 1203 (2008) case? Who were the defendants? What are the facts of the case? Procedural history? Issues (Question)? Holding (Answer)? Judgement? Reasoning? Concurrent and/or Dissenting opinion?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Snyder v. Louisiana 128 S. Ct. 1203 (2008) case:

Plaintiff: Allen Snyder was Petitioner in this case; he was earlier convicted of first-degree murder and was sentenced to death in a Louisiana court.

Defendants: The State of Louisiana

Facts of the case:

  • In the case at trial court, Allen Snyder was found guilty of first-degree murder and was assigned death penalty (August 1996)
  • out of 36 potential jurors, five were African American
  • However, all five were rejected by prosecution by utilizing their peremptory strikes.
  • U.S Supreme Court determined that trial court made an error and violated supreme courts earlier ruling in Batson v. Kentucky case.

Procedural history:

  • The Petitioner appealed his conviction on basis of Batson v. Kentucky case.
  • The Louisiana Supreme Court, rejected petitioners claim but remanded petitioner to competent to stand trial.
  • The petitioner than made a petition in U.S Supreme Court

Issue:

The Supreme Court questioned that does this act of trial court where rejecting of African American jurors was conducted is subject to a violation of the Equal Protection Clause?

Holding:

  • Trial judge acted inappropriately.
  • The U.S Supreme Court determined that trial court made an error and violated supreme courts earlier ruling in Batson v. Kentucky case.
  • Trial court must have applied higher standard of defence in their process.

Reasoning:

If a trial court i.e. legal system will indulge in act of racial discrimination, it will be difficult to overcome this gap.

Dissenting opinion:

Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Scalia wrote that that the decisions of trial court were fact based.


Related Solutions

In the discrimination case Connecticut v. Teal, the following data were given concerning a CT state...
In the discrimination case Connecticut v. Teal, the following data were given concerning a CT state agency's record of employees rejected or selected for promotion. Selected Rejected Blacks 26 22 Whites 206 53 In discrimination cases, sometimes the blacks and whites described in such a table are viewed as samples from theoretical populations that might result if large numbers of blacks and whites were considered for promotion by the agency. Test the claim that the population of whites selected for...
Case study: Nellie Snyder is a 38-year-old woman with breast cancer who is receiving radiation and...
Case study: Nellie Snyder is a 38-year-old woman with breast cancer who is receiving radiation and chemotherapy. She is experiencing significant nausea and vomiting. Her oncologist orders ondansetron 8 mg IV to be administered 30 minutes prior to her chemotherapy and 8 to 16 mg PO every 8 hours as needed. She also receives metoclopramide 10 mg PO four times a day (30 minutes before meals and at bedtime). Ms. Snyder is concerned about the amount of medication she is...
In the Skilling v. United States 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010), what did the court hold...
In the Skilling v. United States 130 S. Ct. 2896 (2010), what did the court hold regarding "honest services"?
#6. In 2008, there were 507 children in Arizona out of 32,601 who were diagnosed with...
#6. In 2008, there were 507 children in Arizona out of 32,601 who were diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) ("Autism and developmental," 2008). Find the proportion of children with ASD in Arizona with a confidence level of 99%. Blank #1: Report the bounds of the 99% confidence interval as lower bound,upper bound with commas in between and no additional spaces. Report bounds to three decimal places. So, in context, 99% confident that the true proportion of children with ASD...
Brief the following case: Joseph Radtke, S.c., Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 895 F.2d...
Brief the following case: Joseph Radtke, S.c., Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 895 F.2d 1196 (7th Cir. 1990) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/895/1196/46650/
If you were the Chief of the Memphis Police Department during the Tennessee v. Garner case,...
If you were the Chief of the Memphis Police Department during the Tennessee v. Garner case, what ethical dilemmas do you think should be addressed immediately upon the Supreme Court's decision?
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part...
Castaneda v. Partida is an important court case in which statistical methods were used as part of a legal argument. When reviewing this case, the Supreme Court used the phrase "two or three standard deviations" as a criterion for statistical significance. This Supreme Court review has served as the basis for many subsequent applications of statistical methods in legal settings. (The two or three standard deviations referred to by the Court are values of the z statistic and correspond to...
onsider the “Dahl v. Angle: Who Owns Frozen Embryos?" court case and the commerce of reproductive...
onsider the “Dahl v. Angle: Who Owns Frozen Embryos?" court case and the commerce of reproductive technology to discuss and defend your positionC
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT