1.
Recognize current
research-derived models of clinical reasoning in the physical
therapy literature and how this knowledge enhances the teaching and
the learning of clinical reasoning in practice.
- Clinical Reasoning is
the process by which a therapist interacts with a patient,
collecting information, generating and testing hypotheses, and
determining optimal diagnosis and treatment based on the
information obtained.
- Clinical reasoning is
“the sum of the thinking and decision-making processes associated
with clinical practice.
- Clinical Reasoning is
integral to physiotherapy practice.
- As a concept, clinical
reasoning is quite a simple one however in practice, it is
difficult and fraught with errors.
- The aim of clinical
reasoning is to prevent misdirection.
- The most common form of
clinical reasoning within the physiotherapy profession is
hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Within
hypothetico-deductive reasoning, the clinician gains initial clues
in regards to the patients problem (from the subjective assessment)
which forms initial hypotheses in the therapists mind.
- Continual hypothesis
generation may occur during management and
reassessment.
- clinical
reasoning includes an ability to
integrate and apply different types of knowledge, to weigh
evidence, critically think about arguments and to reflect upon the
process used to arrive at a diagnosis.
- The result of
the clinical reasoning will guide the decision making, which
may be diagnostic or therapeutic.It helps for new learning.
2.
Recognize characteristics of
the clinical reasoning expert physical therapists and how these can
be used to guide students’ learning of clinical
reasoning.
The characteristics include
- Clinical
reasoning, clinical judgment and
critical thinking are terms that are used interchangeably in
literature to represent a cognitive process which underpins safe
and effective care delivery.
- Identification of
the clinical information that is relevant to diagnosis;
interpretation of its meaning
- Generation of
hypotheses which provide a coherent explanation of the patient's
problem
- Testing and refining of
those hypotheses through further data collection
Clinical reasoning is
an essential part of medical practice and therefore clinical
reasoning helps the teachers to guide the students in an
interesting manner. It helps the clinical teachers with the
teaching of clinical skills.
3. Discuss the
interdependence of deductive and inductive reasoning in adopting a
biopsychosocial approach to patient care.
Inductive
reasoning aims at developing a
theory while deductive reasoning aims at testing an existing
theory. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to
broad generalizations, and deductive reasoning the other way
around.
The inductive approach
begins with a set of empirical observations, seeking patterns in
those observations, and then theorizing about those patterns. The
deductive approach begins with a theory, developing hypotheses from
that theory, and then collecting and analyzing data to test those
hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning
in ethics provides the means through which the patient’s, the
caregiver’s, and the therapist’s voices counterbalance the
deductive reasoning process. Just as with clinical reasoning,
expert physical therapists engage in a fluid back-and-forth between
deductive and inductive when considering the ethical dimensions of
their work with patients and caregivers.