In: Economics
The table would be as below. Note that the phone minute is sorted reversely.
RT | TU | MU | MU/P | PM | TU | MU | MU/P |
0 | 0 | 200 | 1100 | 1 | 20 | ||
1 | 80 | 80 | 40 | 180 | 1080 | 2 | 40 |
2 | 150 | 70 | 35 | 160 | 1040 | 3 | 60 |
3 | 210 | 60 | 30 | 140 | 980 | 4 | 80 |
4 | 260 | 50 | 25 | 120 | 900 | 5 | 100 |
5 | 300 | 40 | 20 | 100 | 800 | 6 | 120 |
6 | 330 | 30 | 15 | 80 | 680 | 7 | 140 |
7 | 200 | -130 | -65 | 60 | 540 | 8 | 160 |
8 | 180 | -20 | -10 | 40 | 380 | 9 | 180 |
9 | 160 | -20 | -10 | 20 | 200 | 10 | 200 |
10 | 140 | -20 | -10 | 0 | 0 |
Jeremy's budget constraint would be as , and for the given values, we have . This is the required Jeremy's consumption choice budget constraint. The combinations for each RT is matched in the table above correspondingly, and the combination of RT and PM in the table would exhaust the income.
We have , ie the change in utility for a unit increase in quantity consumed. The utility would be maximum where for the combination be exhausting utility, and the marginal utility per price is given in the table above.
Hence, the utility would be maximum where RT=1 & PM=180, ie utility would be maximum for 1 roundtrip and 180 phone minutes, given the prices and income.