In: Economics
The table would be as below. Note that the phone minute is sorted reversely.
RT | TU | MU | MU/P | PM | TU | MU | MU/P |
0 | 0 | 200 | 1100 | 1 | 20 | ||
1 | 80 | 80 | 40 | 180 | 1080 | 2 | 40 |
2 | 150 | 70 | 35 | 160 | 1040 | 3 | 60 |
3 | 210 | 60 | 30 | 140 | 980 | 4 | 80 |
4 | 260 | 50 | 25 | 120 | 900 | 5 | 100 |
5 | 300 | 40 | 20 | 100 | 800 | 6 | 120 |
6 | 330 | 30 | 15 | 80 | 680 | 7 | 140 |
7 | 200 | -130 | -65 | 60 | 540 | 8 | 160 |
8 | 180 | -20 | -10 | 40 | 380 | 9 | 180 |
9 | 160 | -20 | -10 | 20 | 200 | 10 | 200 |
10 | 140 | -20 | -10 | 0 | 0 |
Jeremy's budget constraint would be as
, and for the given values, we have
. This is the required Jeremy's consumption choice budget
constraint. The combinations for each RT is matched in the table
above correspondingly, and the combination of RT and PM in the
table would exhaust the income.
We have
, ie the change in utility for a unit increase in quantity
consumed. The utility would be maximum where
for the combination be exhausting utility, and the marginal
utility per price is given in the table above.
Hence, the utility would be maximum where RT=1 & PM=180, ie utility would be maximum for 1 roundtrip and 180 phone minutes, given the prices and income.