Question

In: Economics

An environmental engineer wants to evaluate three different methods for disposing of nonhazardous chemical waste: land...

An environmental engineer wants to evaluate three different methods for disposing of nonhazardous chemical waste: land application, fluidized-bed incineration, and private disposal contract. Use the estimates below to help her determine which has the least cost at i = 8% per year on the basis of an annual worth evaluation.

Land Incineration Contract
First Cost $-140,000 $-700,000 0
AOC per Year $-85,000 $-40,000 $-130,000
Salvage Value $20,000 $250,000 0
Life 4 years 6 years 2 years

The environmental engineer selects a ---------------

a. private disposal contract
b. fluidized-bed incineration  
c. land application  .

Solutions

Expert Solution

# Annual worth by Private Disposal Contract:

The annual worth will be the Annual Operating Costs as there is no other expense involved under this contract.

Therefore, Annual worth of Private Disposal Contract = $130,000

# Annual worth by Fluidized-bed Incineration method:

Annual depreciation = (First Cost - Salvage Value) / Life

= (700,000 - 250,000) / 6

= $75,000

Interest per annum = First Cost * Interest rate

= 700,000 * 8%

= $56,000

Total Annual worth = Annual depreciation + Interest per annum + AOC per Year

= 75,000 + 56,000 + 40,000

= $171,000

Therefore, Annual worth of Incineration = $171,000

# Annual worth by Land Application method:

Annual depreciation = (First Cost - Salvage Value) / Life

= (140,000 - 20,000) / 4

= $30,000

Interest per annum = First Cost * Interest rate

= 140,000 * 8%

= $11,200

Total Annual worth = Annual depreciation + Interest per annum + AOC per Year

= 30,000 + 11,200 + 85,000

= $126,200

Therefore, Annual worth of Land Application = $126,200.

It can be seen from the calculation of annual worth of each contract that the the Land application will be the most economical to use since it has the least cost among the three options.

Therefore the correct answer is option C. Land application.


Related Solutions

Evaluate the physical and chemical methods of waste treatment? How efficient are they in and what...
Evaluate the physical and chemical methods of waste treatment? How efficient are they in and what is their effect on the environment (positive and/or negative)?
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST=10,740; SSTR=4,540 a. Set up...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST is 10, 760 SSTR...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST is 10, 760 SSTR...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,780; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 27 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 9 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the ANOVA was performed on the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,400; SSTR = 4,700. State the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 15 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 5 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. What is the rejection region for the ANOVA test using...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 36 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 12 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 12,960; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,840; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,790; SSTR =...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT