Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...

Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 15 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 5 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. What is the rejection region for the ANOVA test using an arbitrary level of significance .

Solutions

Expert Solution

There are k = 3 methods that are present for assembling the products. A total of N = 15 employees have been assigned randomly to check for the number of units that are correctly assembled by each method.

For an ANOVA test, F-statistic is used. The statistic is calculated as the ratio of Mean Squares Between Groups and Mean Square Within Groups. The degrees of freedom for Within Groups is df1 = k-1 = 3-2 = 2. The degrees of freedom for Between Groups is df2 = N-k = 15-3 = 12.

We can keep a significance level that is commonly used. This significance level is 0.05.

Now using the F-table, the significance level of 0.05, and the degrees of freedom (2, 12), we can get the critical value. This significance level is 3.8853.

Therefore, the rejection region will be for F<3.8853 and also for the negative side i.e. for F>-3.8853.

To summarize, the rejection region for the test becomes -3.8853 < F < 3.8853.


Related Solutions

Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST=10,740; SSTR=4,540 a. Set up...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST is 10, 760 SSTR...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST is 10, 760 SSTR...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,780; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 27 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 9 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the ANOVA was performed on the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,400; SSTR = 4,700. State the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 36 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 12 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 12,960; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,840; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,790; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method,  employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by  workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained:; .SST= 10,780; SSTR= 4,520 a. Set up the ANOVA...
An environmental engineer wants to evaluate three different methods for disposing of nonhazardous chemical waste: land...
An environmental engineer wants to evaluate three different methods for disposing of nonhazardous chemical waste: land application, fluidized-bed incineration, and private disposal contract. Use the estimates below to help her determine which has the least cost at i = 8% per year on the basis of an annual worth evaluation. Land Incineration Contract First Cost $-140,000 $-700,000 0 AOC per Year $-85,000 $-40,000 $-130,000 Salvage Value $20,000 $250,000 0 Life 4 years 6 years 2 years The environmental engineer selects...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT