Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...

Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,790; SSTR = 4,550.

  1. Set up the ANOVA table for this problem (to 2 decimals, if necessary). Round p-value to four decimal places.
    Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square F p-value
    Treatments
    Error
    Total

  2. Use = .05 to test for any significant difference in the means for the three assembly methods.

    The p-value is Selectless than .01between .01 and .025between .025 and .05between .05 and .10greater than .10

    What is your conclusion?
    SelectConclude not all means of the three assembly methods are equalCannot reject the assumption that the means of all three assembly methods are equal

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given:

Number of treatmnet (t) = 3

Total sample size (n) = 30 employees

10 workers each

SST = 10,790

SSTR = 4550

ANOVA TABLE:

Source of Variation df SS MSS F P-value
Treatment t-1 = 3-1 = 2.00 4550 =2275 9.84 0.0006
error =n-t=30-3 = 27 =10790-4550 = 6240 231.1111111
Total 29.00 10790

df_Treatment = t-1 = 3-1 = 2

df_error = n-t = 30-3 = 27

df_total = n-1 = 30-1 = 29

SS_Error = SS_Total - SS_Treatment

SS_Error = 10790 - 4550

SS_Error = 6240

MS_Treatment = SS_Treatment - df_Treatment

MS_Treatment = 4550 / 2

MS_Treatment = 2275

MS_Error = SS_Error / df_Error

MS_Error = 6240 / 27

MS_Error = 231.111

Test statistic:

F = MS_Treatment / MS_Error

F = 2275 / 231.11

F = 9.84

b)

P-value = 0.0006

ANSWER: A

less than 0.01

P-value < , i.e. 0.0006 < 0.05, That is Reject Ho at 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

ANSWER: A

Conclude not all means of the three assembly methods are equal


Related Solutions

Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST=10,740; SSTR=4,540 a. Set up...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST is 10, 760 SSTR...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST is 10, 760 SSTR...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,780; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 27 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 9 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the ANOVA was performed on the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,400; SSTR = 4,700. State the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 15 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 5 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. What is the rejection region for the ANOVA test using...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 36 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 12 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 12,960; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method, 30 employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by 10 workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained: SST = 10,840; SSTR =...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the...
Three different methods for assembling a product were proposed by an industrial engineer. To investigate the number of units assembled correctly with each method,  employees were randomly selected and randomly assigned to the three proposed methods in such a way that each method was used by  workers. The number of units assembled correctly was recorded, and the analysis of variance procedure was applied to the resulting data set. The following results were obtained:; .SST= 10,780; SSTR= 4,520 a. Set up the ANOVA...
An environmental engineer wants to evaluate three different methods for disposing of nonhazardous chemical waste: land...
An environmental engineer wants to evaluate three different methods for disposing of nonhazardous chemical waste: land application, fluidized-bed incineration, and private disposal contract. Use the estimates below to help her determine which has the least cost at i = 8% per year on the basis of an annual worth evaluation. Land Incineration Contract First Cost $-140,000 $-700,000 0 AOC per Year $-85,000 $-40,000 $-130,000 Salvage Value $20,000 $250,000 0 Life 4 years 6 years 2 years The environmental engineer selects...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT