Question

Why is beneficence a more complex principle then nonmaleficence?

Answer 1

Beneficence requires an action that is generally empathetic and is not motivated by self-interest. So, the first step is doing something beneficial for others. The other side is just not doing anything harmful for others.Nonmaleficence is simply the principle of not doing harm.

Beneficence involves balancing the benefits of treatment against the risks and costs involved, whereas non-maleficence means avoiding the causation of harm. As many treatments involve some degree of harm, the principle of non-maleficence would imply that the harm should not be disproportionate to the benefit of the treatment.

i.e. respecting their views about a particular treatment. For example, it may be necessary to provide treatment that is not desired in order to prevent the development of a future, more serious health problem. The treatment might be unpleasant, uncomfortable or even painful but this might involve less harm to the patient than would occur, were they not to have it.

So that it is a more complicated principle.

Where as The principle of “Non-Maleficence” requires an intention to avoid needless harm or injury that can arise through acts of commission or omission. In common language, it can be considered “negligence” if you impose a careless or unreasonable risk of harm upon another

Summery : Non-Maleficence is a simple which means reminds you that the primary concern when carrying out a task is to do no harm.

Beneficence is complicated theory as it promotes action that will support others. Which means at the same time it does the both 'Do not harm and promote well-being.

These two theories taken together state that you must act in a manner that cultivates benefit for another, and at the same time protects that person from harm.