Question

In a socioenvironmental approach to health, what questions would you need to address to decrease smoking behaviour with her

Answer 1

Our environment is adversely impacted and impaired by tobacco products. Not only are cigarette butts a nuisance, they are hazardous waste They include contaminants that damage our wildlife by contaminating our waterways and soil. Fires that can kill homes and land can be sparked by discarded lit cigarettes. Fires that can kill homes and land can be sparked by discarded lit cigarettes.Cleaning up cigarette waste is also very expensive-an issue that continues to increase every year.

The state budgets more than $9 billion a year on tobacco-related treatment costs.. As a result of decreased job efficiency due to increased employee smoke breaks, sickness and death, another $8.5 billion per year is wasted.

Social impact

According to the WHO report, smoking is viewed as a preventable cause of premature death in developed countries in 2018, while smoking epidemics are now becoming much more prevalent in developing countries and accepted as a societal norm.. These countries primarily focus on malnutrition and infectious diseases and offer low priority to problems linked to the consumption of tobacco products.

In the country , the government fears that an increase in levies on purchases of cigarettes and other proven cost-effective steps to control tobacco will damage its economy in terms of revenue, employment and income losses.

It has been found that while they are still teenagers, most smokers become addicted. Among other reasons, youths vape for them to appear mature, explore, and be like their mates. This shows that smoking actually offers the user a psychological reward by making them believe that they are part of a community that creates a feeling of warmth and acceptance.

Cigarette use in the country is growing. Adults smoke because of psychological and economic difficulties as they face mounting tension and pressures. They'll smoke and have the confidence to get over their troubles in order to be comfortable.Others smoke because they feel comfortable for themselves while smoking and it gives them a feeling of satisfaction.

In order to educate young people on the short- and long-term consequences of cigarette smoking, the inclusion of awareness services in the school curriculum could be important. Efficient warning warnings on all tobacco cigarette products will also need to be implemented. The government should enforce a scheme that uses wireless networks to deliver text messages to everyone stating the negative consequences of smoking and urging people to avoid smoking.

Environmental impact

In respects that go well beyond the consequences of the smoke that smokers bring into the air, the tobacco industry affects the atmosphere. The production of tobacco, the manufacture of cigarettes and the method of selling goods to consumers all have environmental effects, which could include deforestation, the use of fossil fuels and the disposal or leakage into the natural world of cigarette waste products The entire life cycle adversely affects the environment, from rising tobacco plants to the disposal of cigarette butts.

Cigarette butts and the environment

Veldt fires

The common cause of most veldt fires as smouldering butts are tossed on dry grass is cigarette smoking in rural and industrial agricultural areas.

Veldt fires have a negative effect on the ecosystem, especially in communal areas, where all damageable material has been burned. Trees, animal habitats, agriculture, cattle, human life and livelihoods are seriously threatened by velvet fires. Destruction of fauna and flora has influenced the natural world, while the destruction of land, waste and, at times, damage have been the order of the day in the human environment. Veldt fires also lead to a reduction in the climate of veldt and a rise in air emissions, lowering the air quality that people can need to breathe. These fires emit into the air millions of tonnes of gases and particulate matter, which would have a significant effect on public health and the carbon balance that leads to global climate change.

Veldt fires will create an unclean environment, significant environmental destruction and reduced livelihoods if not controlled. This will result in serious loss of the veldt, impacting the flora and fauna adversely. Therefore, because populations depend on the very deteriorated environment, veldt fires often pose some danger to human life. Air and water may be poisoned by such veldt fires, raising health risks due to the natural environment's consequent non-sustainability.

Water pollution

The end point of the life cycle of cigarettes is tobacco waste, and the resulting cigarette butts are the largest single form of litter by volume. Tobacco waste ends up everywhere, and for many communities , especially those with little resources to remove it, it is a well-known public nuisance. The costs of cleaning and disposal are tobacco use costs not actually paid by farmers, dealers or consumers of tobacco products. Municipalities are typically responsible for the cleanup costs of tobacco waste in the form of recycled cigarette butts. Cigarette butts on landfill disposal create excess liquid waste such as heavy metals and toxins such as arsenic leaching from butts

It continues to cause environmental harm in the form of non-biodegradable butts long after a cigarette has been extinguished, millions of kilogrammes of which are discarded each year. The most prominent thing accumulating in the local waste stream is butts. Tossing a cigarette butt on the ground has become one of the world's most accepted ways of littering, and for many smokers, this has become a societal norm. The rise in butt disposal directly into the air was due to the imposition of smoking bans in offices, pubs, restaurants, etc.

When butts are transported into storm drains through rainfall and urban drainage to lakes , reservoirs, wetlands, and even underground bodies of drinking water, harmful chemicals in cigarette butts lead to non-point source contamination. Pollution from a non-point source has adverse effects on sources of drinking water.

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) pollution

Tobacco smoke consisting of fumes and solid particles. 10% is made up of solid elements of cigarette smoke, such as tar and nicotine, while approximately 90% is made up of gases. Carbon monoxide is the main gas found in cigarette smoke. Formaldehyde, acrolein, mercury, nitrogen oxides, pyridine, cyanide hydrogen, vinyl chloride, N-nitrosodimethylamine, and acrylonitrile are additional gases. For these, the probable or known human carcinogens are formaldehyde, N-nitrosodimethylamine, and vinyl chloride. It is known that acrylonitrile causes cancer in animals.

ETS intake has been calculated in terms of "cigarette equivalents." By assessing carboxyhemoglobin levels in the blood, cigarette equivalents can be measured. When anyone inhales carbon monoxide, carboxyhemoglobin forms in the blood. Oxyhemoglobin is referred to as the haemoglobin in the blood that has oxygen bound to it. It is the oxyhemoglobin in the tissues that contains oxygen. Carbon monoxide, however, has a much greater appeal than oxygen to haemoglobin. Therefore, inhaled carbon monoxide readily replaces the oxygen in the oxyhemoglobin and attaches to the haemoglobin to form carboxyhemoglobin that can be identified. Different results suggest that passive ETS exposure over an 8-hour day is equal to direct smoking of one to three cigarettes.

While no one study can conclude that as a result of exposure to ETS, there is a 100 percent risk of health complications, a correlation between ETS and different health issues is considered very likely since there is:

· The established correlation of aggressive smoking between heart disease and lung cancer

· The accumulation of many known carcinogens in cigarette smoke in the atmosphere

· The general recognition that the risk of such diseases is specifically connected to the quantity of cigarette smoke inhaled

When data from multiple experiments is combined, they say that exposure to ETS raises the number of non-smoker lung cancers found. Non-smoking smokers' co-workers are at relative risk of being harmed.Non-smokers with heart disease (angina pectoris) exposed to ETS had higher heart rates, elevated blood pressure and elevated blood carbon monoxide in ventilated and unventilated spaces. ETS aggravates asthma symptoms. Asthmatics' respiratory tract is typically more irritating and can make certain asthmatic symptoms, such as wheezing, worse.

Deforestation

The major source of deforestation in nations is tobacco cultivation. There is evidence of significant, and largely permanent, losses incurred by tobacco cultivation of trees and other plant species that render it a particular threat to biodiversity.

Another hurdle is tobacco prevention initiatives aimed at protecting people's climate and health.

Tobacco is dried and curated after harvesting to protect it for packaging, shipping, and refining.

Smoking impact on public health

Tobacco, regardless of how you smoke it, is bad for one's well-being. No safe substances remain in every tobacco product, from acetone and tar to nicotine and carbon monoxide. The chemicals that one inhales affect not just the lungs. The entire body is affected by them.No healthy way to smoke is available.

Smoking tobacco harms virtually every organ in the body, induces multiple diseases and, in general, lowers smokers' wellbeing . Quitting smoking decreases one 's risk for illnesses associated with smoking and can add years to one's life. Smoking destroys almost every organ of the body and affects the general wellbeing of an individual. Smoking induces reduced physical wellbeing, increased workplace absenteeism, and increased usage and cost of healthcare

Smoking control

Establishing enhanced manufacturer oversight and quality procurement systems will lead to public health results, such as minimising the consumption of cigarettes and rising the cost of tobacco products, enacting additional restrictions and labels on tobacco products to make the substance less marketable, and reinforcing current policies against litter and outdoor smoking. This may also entail huge public awareness efforts on the environmental consequences of tobacco waste, creating support for activism against reckless management of tobacco waste. Numerous criteria should also be used to assess if tobacco product waste can adhere to extended values and expectations of producer duty and product stewardship.