Question

In: Economics

1. Why is deterrence needed for intentional torts (where punitive damages are awarded) rather than negligent...

1. Why is deterrence needed for intentional torts (where punitive damages are awarded) rather than negligent torts?

2. Why are costs imposed on others without their consent problematic for a market economy

Solutions

Expert Solution

ansss....
2.
The market economy is based upon demand and supply with minimum government intervention. Here, the demand created by the people will be fed by the supply created by the firms. Thus, pricing strategy will be applied by the firms in the wake of demand for their products. If demand is more, the price will be high and consumers will pay willfully. When, demand is less and supply is more, the price will come down. Thus, whoever will have market power, will rule the market. Here, no any cost is applied to anyone without their consent. Every cost is based upon the demand and supply and people willfully pay for it. It is also the primary reason that negative externality is not imposed on market economy because market demand and supply will automatically take care of it.

Imposing it upon someone will disturb the market oriented mechanism of the economy. Under tort laws provisions, damages to someone due to the action of another will be taken care off in the form of damage claims. Thus, no externality or cost needs to be applied in a market based economy as it will interfere with the market based economy.


Related Solutions

18. Punitive damages are defined as damages that are awarded to punish the Defendant, to deter...
18. Punitive damages are defined as damages that are awarded to punish the Defendant, to deter the Defendant from similar conduct in the future, and set an example for others True or False
Hospitals are never liable for: a. negligent torts b. malpractice c. intentional torts d. unintentional torts...
Hospitals are never liable for: a. negligent torts b. malpractice c. intentional torts d. unintentional torts e. None
1.Describe the objectives of tort law. 2.Discuss the distinctions among negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict...
1.Describe the objectives of tort law. 2.Discuss the distinctions among negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict liability. 3.What forms of negligence are described in this chapter? 4.How does one distinguish between negligence and malpractice? 5.What elements must be proven in order to be successful in a negligence suit? Illustrate your answer with a case (the facts of the case can be hypothetical). 6.Can a "duty to care" be established by statute or contract? Discuss your answer. 7.Describe the categories of...
Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors...
Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors should be found civilly liable (not criminally) for mass shooting death
Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors...
Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors should be found civilly liable (not criminally) for mass shooting deaths.
1. Describe the difference between intentional torts against persons and intentional torts against property. Include a...
1. Describe the difference between intentional torts against persons and intentional torts against property. Include a minimum of three categories of both types of torts, and provide an example of each one in your own words.  
List 5 intentional torts, and explain the elements needed to prove each. List and explain the...
List 5 intentional torts, and explain the elements needed to prove each. List and explain the elements to prove negligence. What is the difference between negligence per se and comparative negligence? What is the relationship between contributory negligence and res ispa loquitor? What are the differences in the 3 types of damages available in a tort case?
One reason why a court might award reliance damages rather than expectancy damages in a breach...
One reason why a court might award reliance damages rather than expectancy damages in a breach of contract case is Group of answer choices reliance damages are the preferred method of recovery reliance damages are almost always larger than expectancy damages expectancy damages may be speculative and therefore difficult to compute Flag this Question Question 151 pts Homeowner H contracts with painter P to paint his house on April 30 for the amount of $5,000. The fair market value of...
Why are punitive damages so important? Also, why do you think that most insurance companies refuse...
Why are punitive damages so important? Also, why do you think that most insurance companies refuse to pay for punitive damages?
Why are plasma membranes arranged as a bilayer rather than a monolayer?
Why are plasma membranes arranged as a bilayer rather than a monolayer?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT