Question

In: Economics

Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors...

Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors should be found civilly liable (not criminally) for mass shooting death

Solutions

Expert Solution

Civil liability assumes a significant job in injury counteraction. In conditions where lawmakers have been reluctant to authorize guidelines to improve security, hazardous items and indiscreet industry rehearses are typically kept within proper limits by the chance of common suit that empowers harmed people to recuperate financially. This standard doesn't have any significant bearing to the firearm business, be that as it may, on the grounds that it has gotten remarkable resistance from this longstanding arrangement of responsibility.

The hypothesis behind holding gun manufacturers of obligated is that despite the fact that they may take part in legal, non-careless movement; makers ought not to expose honest casualties to dangers and wounds that the utilization of their items extraordinarily causes. There is by all accounts little avocation for not having any significant bearing this rule to the individuals who take part in the appropriation or assembling of handguns, which are every year utilized in 650,000 savage violations. In excess of 38,000 Americans kick the bucket every year from wounds identified with guns.

A handgun is a strangely hazardous item, and its assembling and deal are ultra-hazardous exercises. Under both of these hypotheses, exacting obligation follows. It ought not to make any difference if there is a mediating criminal act by a third individual, in light of the fact that the dispersion of the handgun itself makes the danger of that demonstration. Additionally, under ordinary tort law, just the honest casualty could recoup, not the criminal who is shot.

Strict liability for handgun wounds would not wipe out all weapons. It doesn't confine any individual's entitlement to claim a weapon. It would not take out all firearm savagery. In any case, it is one approach to start managing the human and money related expenses of the pandemic of firearm caused wounds and deaths.


Related Solutions

Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors...
Using your understanding of torts, both intentional and negligent, discuss whether gun manufacturers, sellers or distributors should be found civilly liable (not criminally) for mass shooting deaths.
1.Describe the objectives of tort law. 2.Discuss the distinctions among negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict...
1.Describe the objectives of tort law. 2.Discuss the distinctions among negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict liability. 3.What forms of negligence are described in this chapter? 4.How does one distinguish between negligence and malpractice? 5.What elements must be proven in order to be successful in a negligence suit? Illustrate your answer with a case (the facts of the case can be hypothetical). 6.Can a "duty to care" be established by statute or contract? Discuss your answer. 7.Describe the categories of...
Hospitals are never liable for: a. negligent torts b. malpractice c. intentional torts d. unintentional torts...
Hospitals are never liable for: a. negligent torts b. malpractice c. intentional torts d. unintentional torts e. None
1. Why is deterrence needed for intentional torts (where punitive damages are awarded) rather than negligent...
1. Why is deterrence needed for intentional torts (where punitive damages are awarded) rather than negligent torts? 2. Why are costs imposed on others without their consent problematic for a market economy
Discuss the concepts of negligence and intentional torts and give examples of these in the healthcare...
Discuss the concepts of negligence and intentional torts and give examples of these in the healthcare industry?
Using Emile Durkheim’s understanding of social integration to discuss whether or not this sociological perspective can...
Using Emile Durkheim’s understanding of social integration to discuss whether or not this sociological perspective can be applied to gang violence, teenage pregnancy, and/or drug addiction?
Discuss 1: Your understanding of the accounting side of payroll 2: Your understanding of the tax...
Discuss 1: Your understanding of the accounting side of payroll 2: Your understanding of the tax side of payroll 3: What's the two major general journal related to payroll 4: sharing payroll working experience here.
Discuss your understanding of determining value for a real estate property using the Sale Comparison Approach,...
Discuss your understanding of determining value for a real estate property using the Sale Comparison Approach, the Cost Approach and the Income Approach from both the residential (personal home) perspective and the commercial investment property perspective.
Discuss your understanding of the term financial management
Discuss your understanding of the term financial management
Discuss YOUR understanding of equal employment opportunity.
Discuss YOUR understanding of equal employment opportunity.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT