Question

In: Operations Management

18. Punitive damages are defined as damages that are awarded to punish the Defendant, to deter...

18. Punitive damages are defined as damages that are awarded to punish the Defendant, to deter the Defendant from similar conduct in the future, and set an example for others

True or

False

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans : True

Punitive damages: It is awarded to punish the defendant and others from conduct just like the conduct that gave rise to the lawsuit, and to penalize the suspect. They're usually awarded to line a public example. Punitive damages area unit awarded occasionally, however, they will be applicable in several things wherever damages would be inadequate to true as a result of the suspect acted in an exceedingly really obvious fashion. Some states have enacted a split-recovery statute during which a little of the punitive damages award goes to the state, not the litigant. Generally, exemplary damages area unit in way over demonstrable injuries. They're sometimes solely awarded in cases brought below civil wrong law, like personal injury or medical malpractice cases, instead of those brought due to a written agreement dispute. However, in some cases, exemplary damages area unit awarded in insurance dangerous religion cases that arise below associate insurance. This is often as a result of in thus me instances the insurer's breach of contract is so wrongful that it breaches the in explicit covenant of fine religion and honest dealing, a tort.

(NOTE: PLEASE LIKE AND UPVOTE MY ANSWER AS THIS WILL HELP ME TO ANSWER MORE QUESTION. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR UPVOTE. )


Related Solutions

1. Why is deterrence needed for intentional torts (where punitive damages are awarded) rather than negligent...
1. Why is deterrence needed for intentional torts (where punitive damages are awarded) rather than negligent torts? 2. Why are costs imposed on others without their consent problematic for a market economy
Do you believe there should be a limit or cap on the amount of damages awarded...
Do you believe there should be a limit or cap on the amount of damages awarded to a plaintiff in a tort case? Why or why not? Be specific. Submission Our discussions are a valuable opportunity to have thoughtful conversations regarding a specific topic. You are required to provide a comprehensive initial post with 3–4 well-developed paragraphs that include a topic sentence and at least 3–5 supporting sentences with additional details, explanations, and examples. In addition, you are required to...
Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss....
Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss.
Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss...
Having established duty, breach and damage, is the defendant liable for all the damages suffered? Discuss in 400 words.
Some states have considered putting a cap on punitive damages, especially in medical malpractice suits because...
Some states have considered putting a cap on punitive damages, especially in medical malpractice suits because the cost of paying huge punitive damages claims is ultimately passed on by insurers to doctors/hospitals in the form of higher insurance premiums. The cost of the higher insurance premiums are then passed on to patients, causing medical care costs to increase. Taking this into consideration, do you think the legislature should place a cap on punitive damages in tort cases? Will a cap...
2. Explain fully the concept of punitive damages. What factors do courts consider in determining whether...
2. Explain fully the concept of punitive damages. What factors do courts consider in determining whether an award of punitive damages is appropriate?
George is awarded $55,000 in compensatory damages for harm to his reputation and $30,000 in compensatory...
George is awarded $55,000 in compensatory damages for harm to his reputation and $30,000 in compensatory damages for bodily injury. In addition, George is awarded $275,000 in punitive damages. How much of these awards must George recognize in taxable income? Group of answer choices $85,000 $275,000 $360,000 $330,000
#32)     Under traditional common law, the damages awarded to his family for the                          &nbs
#32)     Under traditional common law, the damages awarded to his family for the                                        accidental death of the family breadwinner used to be             a) The present value of his expected future earnings.             b) The present value of his expected future earnings and pension benefits.             c) Derived from the compensating differentials in pay for high-risk jobs.             d) The present value of his expected future earnings and pension benefits, plus                         punitive damages for the loss of a...
Why are punitive damages so important? Also, why do you think that most insurance companies refuse...
Why are punitive damages so important? Also, why do you think that most insurance companies refuse to pay for punitive damages?
Rebecca Fowler was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Four others were awarded damages of...
Rebecca Fowler was judged at fault in an automobile accident. Four others were awarded damages of $40,000, $40,000, $50,000 and $50,000. Rebecca has 50/150 bodily injury liability coverage. What amount, if any, would not be covered by her insurance? Select one: a. $180,000 b. $150,000 c. $50,000 d. $30,000 e. None. The total amount would be covered by insurance .
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT