Question

In: Operations Management

Some states have considered putting a cap on punitive damages, especially in medical malpractice suits because...

Some states have considered putting a cap on punitive damages, especially in medical malpractice suits because the cost of paying huge punitive damages claims is ultimately passed on by insurers to doctors/hospitals in the form of higher insurance premiums. The cost of the higher insurance premiums are then passed on to patients, causing medical care costs to increase.

Taking this into consideration, do you think the legislature should place a cap on punitive damages in tort cases? Will a cap on punitive damages defeat the purpose of deterring wrongdoing? Why or why not?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Notwithstanding normal cases made in policy discusses, the hypothetical association between tort reform and medical negligence protection premiums is vague. Basic models propose reforms, for example, punitive harms caps decrease premiums. Progressively detailed models that record for changes in doctor conduct propose caps may increment or have no effect on premiums.

Yes, I think the legislature should place a cap on punitive damages. The medical malpractice risk framework is intended to repay casualties of medicinal malpractice both for monetary harms and non-financial harms, for example, pain, and enduring. A subsequent real capacity of the framework is to give motivating forces to human services experts to give sensible care. By disguising the expense of wounds to doctors, the expectation is that the risk of misbehavior obligation will urge doctors to give care that will diminish the probability of untreatable wounds. Most suppliers buy malpractice insurance to insure themselves against the danger of claims. In the course of the most recent years, protection costs have changed fiercely, and the obligation framework, and huge harm grants specifically, is regularly indicated as the guilty party.

No, a cap on punitive damage doesn’t defeat the purpose of deterring wrongdoing. The subject of whether caps diminish wrongdoing is significant. Proof recommends that caps accompany costs, for example, unbalanced impacts on financially burdened gatherings and defenseless fragments of the populace. So if the advantages administrators guarantee as lower premiums and satisfactory doctor supply and lower medicinal services costs are not understood, caps outcome in an overall deficit. While officials additionally contend that caps will decrease guarded prescription, late investigations demonstrate that specialists participate in considerably less cautious medication than is normally contended. On the off chance that governing bodies are left to hang their caps just on premium decreases as the essential advantage of caps, understanding the connection between tops also, premiums are basic. The potential effect of caps on supplier treatment decisions and their choices over how much exertion to consume to create and keep up restorative mastery foresee that caps will increment damage rates, at any rate under certain conditions. Thus, this may cause an expansion in case rates, all-out payouts by restorative negligence back up plans, and malpractice protection costs.

The effects of punitive harms caps on medical negligence protection premiums that have delivered differing expectations. The most fundamental examinations anticipate that harms caps will diminish retrievals and guarantee rates, decrease the time it takes to settle claims and decrease by and large suit costs. Some anticipate that tort reforms will make a progressively steady obligation condition with less endorsing vulnerability. These impacts, it is contended, will prompt a decrease in medicinal negligence protection premiums. The effects of the cap on motivating forces for suppliers to participate in expensive exercises that lessen the probability of patient wounds contends that in spite of the fact that caps may diminish normal payouts, they likewise may expand the number of cases, consequently neglecting to diminish by and large expenses of covering doctor risk. As cap decrease presentation to risk, the contention goes, the advantages doctors [and oversaw consideration associations that impact their treatment decisions] appreciate from giving costly medications are decreased. The edge, predicts that cap leads to more untreatable wounds foresee that caps will diminish doctor interest in exorbitant endeavors to keep up and create ability. Along these lines, absolute restorative misbehavior guarantor misfortunes will rely upon the impact of tops on case rates in respect to average-case payouts. While absolute malpractice may decline, these speculations anticipate that, under certain conditions, they will stay stable or increment.


Related Solutions

Critics of malpractice suits claim that they have contributed significantly to the rise of medical costs...
Critics of malpractice suits claim that they have contributed significantly to the rise of medical costs and want legislation that would limit the size of awards and lawyers’ fees, or otherwise discourage such suits. Many lawyers are concerned that any such legislation would impair the rights of victims of malpractice to be justly compensated for the damages they have suffered. Discuss the equity-efficiency trade-offs. What do you think should be done?
The last topic we will discuss is medical malpractice. This is not typically considered in a...
The last topic we will discuss is medical malpractice. This is not typically considered in a course dealing with biomedical ethics but because claims of malpractice are common in society in recent times targeting health care practitioners, I think it is worth taking a look at what it is to commit a professional error and why there are so many such claims made against practitioners in the health care field. To be successful in a lawsuit, one needs to show...
(1) Do you think it is a good idea for states to cap noneconomic damages in...
(1) Do you think it is a good idea for states to cap noneconomic damages in tort cases? Explain. (2) Do you think it is a good idea for states to cap total damages in tort cases? Explain. Why are the considerations for this different than for capping noneconomic damages alone? Explain. (3) Give at least one real-life example of a tort case which would likely be negatively affected by caps on damages, meaning the plaintiff will not recover fully...
Medical malpractice is the third leading cause of death in the US. Because of recent judicial...
Medical malpractice is the third leading cause of death in the US. Because of recent judicial decisions, a medical doctor has decided to buy malpractice insurance, which we consider to be a fixed cost. Then: a. The doctor should charge higher prices for her services to make up for the additional cost of the insurance b. The doctor should leave her prices unchanged as this is a fixed cost c. The doctor should charge lower prices to get more customers...
Discuss the pros and cons of litigation in medical malpractice. Also comment on some of the...
Discuss the pros and cons of litigation in medical malpractice. Also comment on some of the readings which detailed areas of innovation such as legislation that allows doctors to apologize without the apology being used as admission of guilt.
Health Law In the United States, all medical malpractice law is litigated and resolved in one...
Health Law In the United States, all medical malpractice law is litigated and resolved in one of two ways. Each state will choose which theory (only one theory is chosen to be used by each state) used to resolve all cases within their jurisdiction. The first is the theory of contributory negligence. In this theory, the original law (and ancient law derived from the Common law of England) states that, under this doctrine, if the patient contributed at all to...
Auto insurance is required in most states to make sure damages, medical and liability claims can...
Auto insurance is required in most states to make sure damages, medical and liability claims can be paid. In Alabama what are the minimum limits required for Automobile insurance? If you traveled to Alaska would your insurance from Alabama be required to cover the higher minimum limits set by that state? Why or why not?
does medical malpractice have a significant impact on healthcare costs and the reputation of individual physicians...
does medical malpractice have a significant impact on healthcare costs and the reputation of individual physicians and facilities
What impact might the typically greater damages awards in the United States have on a businessperson’s...
What impact might the typically greater damages awards in the United States have on a businessperson’s decision about whether to keep the firm’s operations in the United States or move them to another country?  Does the potential cost of paying damages encourage large corporations to outsource jobs to other nations? Why or why not?
We hear stories in the news about cases of medical malpractice that could have been prevented....
We hear stories in the news about cases of medical malpractice that could have been prevented. For your initial post, conduct research for ways to prevent medical malpractice cases. Provide at least 3 ways to prevent these types of cases. How will these prevention measures lead to a decrease in malpractice cases?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT