Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Neuroscience researchers examined the impact of environment on rat development. Rats were randomly assigned to be...

  1. Neuroscience researchers examined the impact of environment on rat development. Rats were randomly assigned to be raised in one of the four following test conditions: Impoverished (wire mesh cage - housed alone), standard (cage with other rats), enriched (cage with other rats and toys), super enriched (cage with rats and toys changes on a periodic basis). After two months, the rats were tested on a variety of learning measures (including the number of trials to learn a maze to a three perfect trial criteria), and several neurological measure (overall cortical weight, degree of dendritic branching, etc.). The data for the maze task is below.

Impoverished

Standard

Enriched

Super Enriched

23

18

12

9

19

21

14

7

15

15

11

11

24

13

9

9

19

19

15

12

26

15

14

8

24

18

12

9

a. Carry out the appropriate statistical analysis using SPSS to test whether the levels are different. Please provide me an annotated copy of your output. Was the assumption of homogeneity of variance met? Explain.

  1. What does the analysis tell you about the null hypothesis?

c. If relevant use one or more post hoc tests, which means were different to which? Explain.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Result:

  1. Neuroscience researchers examined the impact of environment on rat development. Rats were randomly assigned to be raised in one of the four following test conditions: Impoverished (wire mesh cage - housed alone), standard (cage with other rats), enriched (cage with other rats and toys), super enriched (cage with rats and toys changes on a periodic basis). After two months, the rats were tested on a variety of learning measures (including the number of trials to learn a maze to a three perfect trial criteria), and several neurological measure (overall cortical weight, degree of dendritic branching, etc.). The data for the maze task is below.

Impoverished

Standard

Enriched

Super Enriched

23

18

12

9

19

21

14

7

15

15

11

11

24

13

9

9

19

19

15

12

26

15

14

8

24

18

12

9

a. Carry out the appropriate statistical analysis using SPSS to test whether the levels are different. Please provide me an annotated copy of your output. Was the assumption of homogeneity of variance met? Explain.

The Levenes test based on median, test value 1.298, P=0.298 which is > 0.05 level of significance. The assumption of homogeneity of variance is met.

  1. What does the analysis tell you about the null hypothesis?

Calculated F=26.484, P=0.000 which is < 0.05 level of significance. Ho is rejected. we conclude that at least one mean is significantly different from others.

c. If relevant use one or more post hoc tests, which means were different to which? Explain.

Tukey test shows:

Impoverished is significant from other three groups Standard, Enriched and Super Enriched.

Standard is significant from groups Enriched and Super Enriched.

Enriched and Super Enriched are not significant.

SPSS output:

Descriptives

Score

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Minimum

Maximum

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Impoverished

7

21.4286

3.86683

1.46152

17.8523

25.0048

15.00

26.00

Standard

7

17.0000

2.76887

1.04654

14.4392

19.5608

13.00

21.00

Enriched

7

12.4286

2.07020

0.78246

10.5140

14.3432

9.00

15.00

Super Enriched

7

9.2857

1.70434

0.64418

7.7095

10.8620

7.00

12.00

Total

28

15.0357

5.34362

1.00985

12.9637

17.1078

7.00

26.00

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Levene Statistic

df1

df2

Sig.

Score

Based on Mean

3.128

3

24

0.044

Based on Median

1.298

3

24

0.298

Based on Median and with adjusted df

1.298

3

16.417

0.309

Based on trimmed mean

3.037

3

24

0.049

ANOVA

Score

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Between Groups

592.107

3

197.369

26.484

0.000

Within Groups

178.857

24

7.452

Total

770.964

27

Multiple Comparisons

Dependent Variable:   Score

(I) Group

(J) Group

Mean Difference (I-J)

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Tukey HSD

Impoverished

Standard

4.42857*

1.45920

0.027

0.4032

8.4539

Enriched

9.00000*

1.45920

0.000

4.9747

13.0253

Super Enriched

12.14286*

1.45920

0.000

8.1175

16.1682

Standard

Impoverished

-4.42857*

1.45920

0.027

-8.4539

-0.4032

Enriched

4.57143*

1.45920

0.022

0.5461

8.5968

Super Enriched

7.71429*

1.45920

0.000

3.6889

11.7396

Enriched

Impoverished

-9.00000*

1.45920

0.000

-13.0253

-4.9747

Standard

-4.57143*

1.45920

0.022

-8.5968

-0.5461

Super Enriched

3.14286

1.45920

0.165

-0.8825

7.1682

Super Enriched

Impoverished

-12.14286*

1.45920

0.000

-16.1682

-8.1175

Standard

-7.71429*

1.45920

0.000

-11.7396

-3.6889

Enriched

-3.14286

1.45920

0.165

-7.1682

0.8825

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.


Related Solutions

Human Resource Management researchers examined the impact of environment on employee development. Employees were randomly assigned...
Human Resource Management researchers examined the impact of environment on employee development. Employees were randomly assigned one of the following four workplace types/conditions: Impoverished (isolated cubicles each with bare minimum equipment - chair, desk & computer), standard (cubicles placed hear each other, equipped with a 'normal level' of office equipment - printer, shelves, manuals, stationery, etc.), enriched (standard cubicles plus regular work-related meetings), super enriched (enriched environment plus regular non-work-related social events). Employees were also categorized by function they performed...
Human Resource Management researchers examined the impact of environment on employee development. Employees were randomly assigned...
Human Resource Management researchers examined the impact of environment on employee development. Employees were randomly assigned one of the following four workplace types/conditions: Impoverished (isolated cubicles each with bare minimum equipment - chair, desk & computer), standard (cubicles placed hear each other, equipped with a 'normal level' of office equipment - printer, shelves, manuals, stationery, etc.), enriched (standard cubicles plus regular work-related meetings), super enriched (enriched environment plus regular non-work-related social events). Employees were also categorized by function they performed...
Testing syphilis, researchers put syphilis cells on twenty normal rats and randomly assigned ten of these...
Testing syphilis, researchers put syphilis cells on twenty normal rats and randomly assigned ten of these rats to be treated with antibodies. Only 1/10 rats treated with antibodies had the syphilis spread, while all 10 rats in the control group had the syphilis spread. Compare the proportions of rats with syphilis spread in these two condiitons. For the rats, calculate a plus four estimate for the proportion of rats with syphilis spread in the treatment group AND the proportion of...
A group of 32 rats were randomly assigned to each of 4 diets labelled (A, B,C,...
A group of 32 rats were randomly assigned to each of 4 diets labelled (A, B,C, and D). Researchers measured the liver weight as a percentage of body weight (note: two rats escaped and another died), resulting in the following data A B C D 3.42 3.17 3.34 3.65 3.96 3.63 3.72 3.93 3.87 3.38 3.81 3.77 4.19 3.47 3.66 4.18 3.58 3.39 3.55 4.21 3.76 3.41 3.51 3.88 3.84 3.55 3.96 3.44 3.91 Using the the Krusal-Wallis test, is...
SOLVE USING R: Twenty four rug rats were randomly assigned to four groups of six each....
SOLVE USING R: Twenty four rug rats were randomly assigned to four groups of six each. The groups were subjected to different levels of stress (high, moderate, low, and none) induced by occasional, unexpected loud noises. After one week, density of blood lym- phocytes (cells ×106/ml) were measured. Prior studies indicated that the homogeneity assumption was violated and could not be remedied. High: 2.9, 1.8, 2.1, 1.5, 0.9, 2.8 Moderate: 3.7, 4.6, 4.2, 2.8, 3.2, 4.5 Low: 5.2, 6.2, 5.7,...
The researchers examined the mean age of the patients who were depressed and those who were...
The researchers examined the mean age of the patients who were depressed and those who were not. Write an appropriate null and alternative hypothesis. What would be a good statistical test for this analysis and why? The corresponding p value is 0.25? What do you conclude?
A study examined the impact of depression on a patient’s ability to survive cardiac disease. Researchers...
A study examined the impact of depression on a patient’s ability to survive cardiac disease. Researchers identified 450 people with cardiac disease, evaluated them for depression, and followed the group for 4 years. Of the 361 patients with no depression, 67 died. Of the 89 patients with minor or major depression, 26 died. Among the patients who suffer from cardiac disease, are depressed patients more likely to die than non-depressed ones? a. Write appropriate hypotheses. b. Test your hypothesis and...
Researchers examined the reproductive characteristics of the eastern cottonmouth (a type of snake). They were able...
Researchers examined the reproductive characteristics of the eastern cottonmouth (a type of snake). They were able to record the number of baby snakes per litter for 24 female cottonmouths in Florida and 44 female cottonmouths in Virginia. The mean number of young per litter for the sample of cotton- mouths in Florida is 5.46 with a standard deviation of 1.59, and the mean number of young per litter for sample of Virginia cottonmouths is 7.59 with standard deviation 2.68. Preliminary...
Fifteen people were randomly selected from the population and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental...
Fifteen people were randomly selected from the population and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental groups. Group 3 was included as the control group and did not receive any treatment. Use the following data set to answer the questions. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 21 25 32 53 54 41 44 26 86 72 32 75 Is there a significant difference (α=0.05) between at least two groups?   A. Yes B. No C. Not possible to determine D. Alpha...
) In a study of the effects of caffeine on alertness, 32 subjects were randomly assigned...
) In a study of the effects of caffeine on alertness, 32 subjects were randomly assigned to four groups. These groups were C1: wait-list control (no treatment), C2: placebo control, E1: experimental group 1 (mild caffeine treatment) and E2: experimental groups 2 (high caffeine treatment). Several subjects were not able to complete the study, reducing the group n’s to 7, 5, 6, and 3, respectively. The dependent variable scores were performance scores on a visual-motor task requiring alertness. The results...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT